Research on Research Institute (RoRI)

@rorinstitute.bsky.social

RoRI’s mission is to accelerate transformational research on research systems, cultures & decision-making.

Utilising language models to examine citation timelines, a new study co-authored by RoRI Metascience AI Fellow Basil Mahfouz explores the "evidence lag" in emergency policymaking, revealing how COVID-19 education policies frequently overlooked newly available research: www.cell.com/star-protoco...

COVID-19 education policy often relied on older research despite available new evidence

Policymakers are increasingly relying on scientific research, but it remains unclear whether policy decisions reflect the latest available evidence. Building on a previously developed semantic matchin...

cell.com

Writing in @financialtimes.com (£) Anjana Ahuja warns of new US proposals to allow political appointees to veto research grants; RoRI’s @jameswilsdon.bsky.social argues that restricting international partnerships on climate and health is a major blow to global cooperation: www.ft.com/content/e003...

Trump is driving another nail into the coffin of US science

Under proposed reforms, political appointees will review grants to ensure they “advance the President’s priorities”

ft.com

Fantastic perspective on peer review by @rorinstitute.bsky.social, with some great ideas for future improvements to the current limping system: doi.org/10.6084/m9.f...

The Future of Peer Review: A system-wide perspective

This report presents the main outcomes of the PEER REVIEW project conducted by the Research on Research Institute (RoRI) from 2023 to 2026. It draws on the substantial literature on peer review as well as 39 in-depth interviews with experts from across the research system, including policymakers, funders, publishers, editors, researchers and others. Peer review is often seen as one of the cornerstones of the research system. At the same time, many researchers and other actors in the system have expressed deep concerns about dysfunctions of peer review. In response to this, much work has been done to assess and improve peer review in individual domains, notably within research funding, scholarly publishing, career advancement, and assessment of research units.However, by considering peer review in each domain in isolation, knowledge about peer review has remained fragmented, offering a weak basis for strengthening the organisation of peer review.In this report, we take a systemic perspective on peer review across domains. Rather than focusing on incremental process-level innovations in individual domains, we conclude there is a need for system-wide reform in peer review. We outline future pathways for such reform.

doi.org

A great start yesterday to RoRI’s 3-day summit on ‘augmented assessment’ in Cambridge, where we’ve been joined by the architects of research assessment systems from 11 countries, and a fantastic team of metascience experts & facilitators.

Rob Doubleday (CSaP) and James Wilsdon (RoRI) welcoming participants at the start of the meetingDelegates at RoRI’s Summit on Augmented Assessment at Jesus College, Cambridge

RoRI’s @jameswilsdon.bsky.social and @profgeraintrees.bsky.social warn that autonomous AI agents pose an existential threat to research funding by driving grant application costs to zero. They argue assessment must urgently shift away from AI-optimized text to what technology cannot simulate.

LERU Talks - AI and research grants: is the system doomed to collapse?

YouTube video by The League of European Research Universities (LERU)

youtube.com

Driven by AI surges and tight budgets, global science has become an unsustainable competition machine. @ludowaltman.bsky.social & co-authors argue we must move away from micro-managing individual survival towards strategic leadership: researchonresearchinstitute.substack.com/p/from-hyper...

From hyper-competition to strategic leadership

The role of funders and research institutions in 21st-century science

researchonresearchinstitute.substack.com