Rui Lanceiro

@ruilanceiro.bsky.social

Law Professor in the University of Lisbon School of Law | EU Law and Constitutional Law (and some International Law) | Professor na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa

The recent Portuguese elections resulted in a profound change in the political system. The extreme right party gained second place in terms of parliamentary mandates, surpassing the center left party and may present itself as an alternative to power, in line to govern after the next election

Twenty prominent law professors have joined a letter defending academic freedom and the First Amendment against the Trump Administration’s recent treatment of Columbia. Among those from right of center: Michael McConnell, Eugene Volokh, Keith Whittington, Steve Calabresi, and Richard Epstein.

A Statement from Constitutional Law Scholars on Columbia | Eugene Volokh, Michael C. Dorf, David Cole

We write as constitutional scholars—some liberal and some conservative—who seek to defend academic freedom and the First Amendment in the wake of the

nybooks.com

1/🧵 Judges across ideological lines are ruling against Trump at strikingly similar rates (84% liberal, 86% centrist, 82% conservative). This isn't partisan opposition to Trump—it's the judiciary functioning as intended by cutting across partisan lines to uphold the Constitution.

Title: Both Liberal and Conservative Judges Rule Against Trump
Description: A scatter plot showing the rulings of judges against or in favor of Trump, categorized by ideology using the DIME score. The x-axis represents Judge Ideology (DIME Score), ranging from liberal (-1) to conservative (1), and the y-axis represents the case outcome (against or for Trump).
	•	Blue dots represent liberal judges, purple dots represent moderate judges, and red dots represent conservative judges.
	•	Some judges are labeled, including Rudolph Contreras, Lauren King, John Coughenour, and James Emanuel Boasberg on the liberal to moderate side, and Carl Nichols, Richard J. Leon, and Joseph N. Laplante on the conservative side.
	•	A note mentions that Boasberg, though slightly right-leaning, was initially appointed by George W. Bush.
	•	The visualization suggests that judges from both ideological backgrounds ruled against Trump.

A rejeição de uma moção de confiança acarreta a automática demissão do Governo, nos termos do art 195.º, n.º 1, al e), da CRP. Após a demissão do Governo, deve o PR ouvir os partidos representados na AR e ter em conta os resultados eleitorais (art. 187.º, n.º 1).

Interesting format of the #EUCO conclusions, which are adopted by consensus (Art. 15(4) TEU). - There are 2 parts (Part I on #Ukraine; Part II on European #defence). - Part I refers to a document (EUCO 10/25) that is only supported by 26 Member States. www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/pre...

Press releases and statements

Press releases and statements from the European Council and its president, the Council of the EU, Council preparatory bodies and the Eurogroup President.

consilium.europa.eu

No nosso sistema constitucional, a diferença entre uma moção de censura e uma moção de confiança é que a primeira para ser aprovada (melhor dizendo, para levar à demissão do governo) precisa de ser aprovada por maioria absoluta. A de confiança é aprovada por maioria simples.

"If there’s one thing I’d hoped people had learned going into the next four years of Donald Trump as president, it’s that spending lots of time online posting about what people in power are saying and doing is not going to accomplish anything. If anything, it’s exactly what they want."

You Can’t Post Your Way Out of Fascism

Authoritarians and tech CEOs now share the same goal: to keep us locked in an eternal doomscroll instead of organizing against them, Janus Rose writes.

404media.co

In the year that the European Convention of Human Rights turns 70, the Council of Europe has updated and expanded its dedicated website on how the ECHR has impacted law, policy and practice across Europe. It is a very interesting tool not only for students, but also for the greater public.

Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights - Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights - www.coe.int

European convention on human rights : How it changed the lives of many people across the continent.

coe.int

The Supreme Court will consider what the First Amendment, ratified in 1791, has to say about TikTok and online pornography next month. Applying a provision drafted in the age of powdered wigs and quill pens to 21st-century technologies has sometimes proved challenging for the justices.

What Would the Founders Have Thought About TikTok and Online Porn?

The Supreme Court will hear arguments next month in First Amendment challenges to laws banning the app and shielding minors from sexual materials on the internet.

nytimes.com

🎙️ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚: Commission vs Hungary on Klubrádió Case 🗓️ 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐧? Monday 2 December 2024 at 14:30 📍 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞? European Court of Justice 📂 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞? In 2020, Hungary’s Media Council didn't renew Klubrádió’s FM broadcasting rights and imposed rules that forced Klubrádió off the air 🧵1/5

Bild

"We find no evidence that cultural and economic factors play a relevant role in the relationship between rurality and the radical right vote in Portugal. Instead, rural residents are more likely to perceive the areas where they live as *politically* neglected"

Political neglect and support for the radical right: The case of rural Portugal

Why are rural voters more likely to support radical right parties? This paper examines the mechanisms behind the relationship between living in a rura…

sciencedirect.com

🚨 Just in: Manfred Weber (EPP), Iratxe García (S&D) and Valerie Hayer (Renew) have reached a deal to unblock the nominations of Teresa Rivera, Raffaele Fitto and Olivér Várhelyi. The three leaders also commit to a pact on a pro-European coalition for the legislature.

Judgments Cases C‑808/21 and C‑814/21 - Citizenship of the Union: denying EU citizens residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals the right to become a member of a political party infringes EU law. Incredibly important judgement for European citizenship rights and defense of democracy