Ryan Dahn

@ryandahn.com

Editor at @physicstoday.aip.org. Historian studying Nazi science by night. Passionate about Philadelphia urbanism, sports, and politics. All opinions my own. https://ryandahn.com

well, we kinda deserved that after the last 24 hours. seems like the wet president meddling got Belgium fired up as all hell. also bringing on Doku and Lukaku off the bench is such a flex

Another great historical article I edited for @physicstoday.aip.org! Our first-ever feature-length profile of Edward Bouchet, the first Black American to receive a PhD in physics, which he completed 150 years ago at Yale.

Physics Today@physicstoday.aip.org · 2mo ago

Edward Alexander Bouchet, the first African American to receive his PhD, completed his physics degree 150 years ago at @yale.edu. Ronald Mickens provides an overview of his career, which was pathbreaking yet circumscribed by racism. #histSTM #BlackinPhysics

random election thoughts: shouts to the person in my division who wrote in LeBron James as the Democratic nominee for PA Governor!

Be sure to check out this excellent article from @ryandahn.com which provides substantive context and insight on the Oppenheimer oral history’s that the @aiphistory.bsky.social team recently made openly available online.

Ryan Dahn@ryandahn.com · 3mo ago

Extremely proud to say that my new @physicstoday.aip.org feature article is live. In it, I explore the history and context of the rare interviews with J. Robert Oppenheimer recently made public by @aiphistory.bsky.social. physicstoday.aip.org/features/opp...

A Democratic president with simple majorities in Congress could enact proportional representation for the House—no amendments required. 50%+1 could end the filibuster, expand SCOTUS, expand the House, and enact PR by state. And add new states like D.C. to rebalance the Senate while they’re at it

Lee Drutman@leedrutman.bsky.social · 3mo ago

"So in one stroke, PR could do a better job fighting racial vote dilution than Section 2 ever did, and do so without triggering equal protection objections." electionlawblog.org?p=155758