Stephen C. Carlson

@sccarlson.bsky.social

Associate Professor in Biblical and Early Christian Studies at Australian Catholic University (Ph.D. Duke, New Testament, 2012). Många bäckar små gör en stor å.

More fun news: a paper I co-authored with Pasi Hyytiäinen and Tim Finney is now available as an advance article in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities: doi.org/10.1093/llc/.... We investigate the validity of the contested paradigm of text-types using a battery of computational approaches. (1/8)

Comparative computational textual criticism of the Gospel of Mark and the paradigm of textual clusters

Abstract. In New Testament textual criticism, the paradigm of textual clusters has become a controversial subject. Within this paradigm, the traditional pr

doi.org

Congratulations to @joeymccollum.bsky.social for his timely submission of his most excellent dissertation on the text of Ephesians. It has been an absolute joy working with Joey over the past three and a half years and the floor feels a little emptier now that he's back home.

Redirecting...

facebook.com

Joey McCollum@joeymccollum.bsky.social · 11mo ago

Many thanks to my supervisors @sccarlson.bsky.social, @kycrabbe.bsky.social, and Rob Turnbull) and to everyone who supported me for the last 3.5 years! Some people's favorite thing about their thesis is getting it done, but I'm grateful to say that mine was a joy to write, and I'm proud of it.

I have to say I was fairly impressed with Seesengood's little guide to Philemon. He does a good job of introducing students to different and fraught ways of reading a text when we know so little about its context.

Bild

I've read this book now. She calls her view "Dutch Radical Thought 3.0" and, yes, that's what it is. The main thing new and of interest apart from her overall thesis is her comparison of Paul's letters with Seneca's Moral Epistles as "protreptic rhetoric masquerading as genuine letters" (140).

Stephen C. Carlson@sccarlson.bsky.social · 2y ago

Any one familiar with this new book by Nina Livesey, which holds that all the letter attributed to Paul are second century? How does it different from the old (and discredited) Dutch Radical School position on Paul? www.cambridge.org/core/books/l...