woah I put extra effort into engaging with martial law abiding citizen in good faith and they ran out of things to say in response so hard they blocked me I didn't think it was possible
setnoclip01.bsky.social
@setnoclip01.bsky.social
Here for a good and/or long time The most powerful tool one can have is memory.
@wdustice.bsky.social I just noticed your bio is almost identical to mine lol
Something about this exchange feels emblematic, representative of some kind of core dualty. "There's no de-escalating" "Weird, because I already did"
I can't reply (probably because it doesn't need saying) but it's worth highlighting that Kathryn explicitly called "the take" these things, not will contrast with Will's penchant for generalizing ad hominems en masse.
Kathryn Tewson@kathryntewson.bsky.social · 2w agohey just rq can you point to which statement you felt was nasty? 1. "cloistered" 2. "low-nuance" 3. "thoughtlessly reductive" 4. "unsurprising" TIA
@kathryntewson.bsky.social it's an honor how am I doing out here
I know I'm not doing anything for clout but I'm starting to wonder if an 8 follower account can successfully ratio a 101k follower account. It wouldn't mean anything beyond being mildly funny
I should make a pinned post about the set of rules I'm following with this account: I don't want to be accused of only performing to a community for clout, or engaging in bad-faith bandwagoning. To that end, I'm not liking anybody's posts I'm not following anybody I'm not quote-tweeting anybody
@banjessesingal.bsky.social hello, looks like you're having a good time lol
@whstancil.bsky.social hey, olive branch for a moment I realized I have a question actually, political one, that you might be the exact right person to ask. Not a debate, not a gotcha, not snark or a dunk, sincere honest question that I'd like to hear your take on when you have some time, reply?
lurking is starting to get boring, I think I'll start posting