Simulflow (Jerrified)

@simulflow.bsky.social

Singer, cat lover, avid trivia collector. Canadian. Atheist. Ancient history, paleontology, psychology, birding, painting, whisk(e)y, deep dub techno, general mayhem. Married to distant relative of Vincent van Gogh. Lived in South Korea 2005-2009. 환영합니다!

"Mildred Pitts Walter, a Los Angeles schoolteacher who grew up in the Jim Crow South and wrote award-winning children’s books focusing on Black characters, filling a void in her students’ reading material, died on May 19 in Redwood City, Calif. She was 103." www.nytimes.com/2026/07/31/b...

Mildred Pitts Walter, Author of Books for Black Children, Dies at 103 (Gift Article)

Teaching kindergarten in South Central Los Angeles in the 1950s and ’60s, she realized that her students were not represented in the books they read. So she wrote her own.

nytimes.com

Indigenous nations are creating child welfare laws grounded in their own legal traditions. As law professors Val Napoleon and Hadley Friedland note, the work ahead is about “recovering and then taking up an interrupted, intergenerational conversation.” https://ow.ly/oRA750ZuvGL

On the left: an image of a circle of different hands surrounding an illustration of a child wearing a coat and backpack on a blue background.. On the right: text that reads “Canada took First Nations children away. Now communities are bringing them home. The harder challenge will be building services that can help keep the families together”

Here's a bunch of context from Adam Cochran regarding McConnell, Kentucky state law, and August 3rd Basically August 3rd is relevant, but McConnell's staff could game out the system in a myriad of ways to stall a special election Gov. Beshear needs to act quickly

There is lots of confusion around the August 3rd Kentucky date, so let's
clear it up.

First you need to know two things:

1) HB 622 did not amend the state constitution - it amended statutes.
Even after Kentucky's changes Kentucky Constitution $152 still uses the
phrase of "all elective offices" when describing the 3 month cut off date
and gubernatorial appointment. It is worthy of a state Supreme Court
challenge, and likely to win. That means Aug 3rd still relevant.

2) KRS 118.740 requires that proclamations must be sent to the Sheriff's
63 days before the date of the election, with certificates filed 56 days
before. For Nov 3rd that would mean a filing date of Sept 1st.

SO:

You'd have two sides arguing for the 3rd with one saying:

-Section 152 still constitutionally requires a gubernatorial appointment
for statewide vacancies, and HB 622 failed because it tried to remove
that by statute instead of amending Section 152. So while HB 622 is
constitutional under the 17th amendment, it violates the state
constitution.

And the other arguing:

-Section 152 does not reach federal U.S. Senate seats, and the
Seventeenth Amendment lets the Kentucky legislature choose special
election only, with no temporary appointment.

That Supreme Court argument is only relevant AFTER August 3rd and not
likely to be resolved quickly.Secondly, you have the notice periods of the statute.

If you make it having the court case, you can get injunctions against the
proclamation and drag it out.

Because of the 56 day rule, by the time you get to Sept 1st the soonest
you can have the election is now Nov 3rd, meaning you'd have Kentucky
vote for both a special senate election and regular one on the same day.

But even prior to that, you've tied the governors hands.

Is he really going to proclaim a special election just two weeks before the
main one?

And if you can push it back and not have the special election separately,
it's easier to push people to vote for the same candidate on both the
special and regular elections on the same ballot (blocking a Massie run)

And if you can do that, you can ensure that there is no disruption,
especially to McConnell's committee assignments.

And all of that begins with the question "is this constitutional under
Kentucky's state constitution?"

Which is only relevant, if it's after August 3rd.

And if you are Mitch McConnell, or his aides, you know you don't need to
win on the "is it constitutional question" because it's a procedural time
game.

And I can guarantee you, every single person in McConnell's office
knows more procedural games in both Congressional rules and Kentucky
State law than you can imagine.And I can guarantee you, every single person in McConnell's office
knows more procedural games in both Congressional rules and Kentucky
State law than you can imagine.

And given his health, I'm confident they've gamed out a dozen scenarios
like this in advanced.

So is August 3rd as clear cut a date as it was historically? No.

Is it still legally relevant? Absolutely yes.