Sumi Madhok

@sumimadhok.bsky.social

Professor at LSE| Feminist Political Theorist|Own Views| Thinking and writing on human rights|Anti-imperial epistemic justice|Conceptual Diversity| Rights politics in most of the world| Recent book📕 bit.ly/3C3Tb7V

Glad someone senior from the sector is pushing back. Labour MPs need to understand the serious real anger from graduates and the people who produce them. And the dangerous financial situation they have allowed to fester, or indeed worsened, in one of Britain’s leading sectors.

Labour has harmed universities as much as Trump, London School of Economics head says

LSE vice-chancellor Larry Kramer points to domestic student fees freeze, international student limits and rise in employers’ national insurance

ft.com

The point isn't to produce essays, it's to teach students how to think for fuck's sake. The minute you automate that, it's over. You might as well close the course. Which they're also doing. This is an attack on learning, and everyone is just shrugging.

Louis Althusser murdered his wife and “it took over 40 years for this murder to be recognised as a femicide, and only thanks to the work of feminists, researchers and activists who kept the story alive”.

Voxeurop – Independent European journalism@voxeurop.bsky.social · 2w ago

On the femicide of Hélène Rytmann-Legotien: how Louis #Althusser killed his wife and ‘invented’ #masculinism article by @francesca-b.bsky.social with #PulsEurope voxeurop.eu/en/femicide-...

Zohran Mamdani is beauteous on solidarity as a ‘strategy’ for universal justice without exceptions. “But justice is not measured by where we stand after history has issued its verdict. It is measured by where we stand when the verdict is still being rendered”. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Nelson Mandela held a mirror to humanity – and showed us what solidarity means | Zohran Mamdani

In a speech given on Wednesday in honor of Nelson Mandela Day, New York’s mayor reflects on what Madiba can teach us in a fractured era

theguardian.com

Of course, I like to be cited but for the things I’ve actually written! In the last few months I’m noting hallucinatory citations attributed to me, which I’ve no memory of ever having written. Can I say, the article titles are pretty unimaginative and quite rubbish, too. Oh well…

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social · 3w ago

'There are...growing negative impacts of AI on research, such as its use to generate “more-or-less fraudulent or fake” publications to satisfy career demands....some people have warned...[of] a “tipping point” after which it will no longer be able to rely on research to provide useful evidence'. 2/3

OK I’ll say this: Theorists of all stripes from ‘most of the world’— political, feminist, social and cultural—have always theorised from the empirical realities of not only their own but also of ‘other’ worlds. They do because Eurocentred theories and concepts don’t ‘theorise’ ‘other’ worlds.

With hardly any media coverage one of Britain’s few world-leading sectors is, right now, being decimated. The university funding model does not work and anti-immigrant hysteria has deprived the country of the means by which we met the shortfall: international students.

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social · last mo.

A grim day in a grim week in a grim month for UK higher education, with Dundee, Exeter and Hertfordshire all making major announcements of planned redundancies. Shrinkage of the research & teaching base by the invisible hand's visible fist is not an 'us' or 'them', SHAPE or STEM phenomenon. 1/2

Photo of an open hand, with part of 4 fingers showing.

Anthropological research on subsistence is offered in the dangerous and authoritarian “report” on the humanities as a key example of supposed ideological weakening of scholarship. This critique begins to show how the key example cited actually proves the opposite. Let’s go into it in some depth 1/

Academic Authoritarianism in New Attack on Humanities Scholars

There is virtually no evidence offered in the report for its sweeping conclusions about the entirety of the humanities.

insidehighered.com

Maybe I’m in the minority, but it’s unfathomable to me and even somewhat shocking if I am absolutely honest, that academics are using AI to write their research manuscripts. A scholar’s work is attributable to someone. AI implies that there is no one behind the writing. It’s quite something, this.

Prof Lisa Schipper 🌍🍉💪@lisaschipper.bsky.social · 2mo ago

In my capacity as journal editor I want to say this: authors you are not doing yourself any favours by using AI to write your manuscript. I am finding convoluted arguments, bizarre language, weird expressions, and dull writing. Using AI to 'improve' your language may be a pathway to rejection.

There are, in my view, 25 things everyone needs to understand in light of recent events: 1) Those out in our communities last night were not protestors, but organised far right extremists. 2) Their actions align with fascist ideologies. 3) So yes: these are fascist practices on our streets. 🧵

Thinking of Helen De Cruz suddenly today, and their guiding words for doing philosophy: "We should write philosophy with a sense of urgency, a sense of survival, a sense of horror and wonder at the world." ❤️‍🩹