tchypz

@tchypz.com

📍 🏙️ 💼 💻 💭 🏞️

to all those who dare judge: consider that I am merely ahead of you on the fucking around (and therefore, on the finding out). you all look tiny from here.

They better hurry up and announce that GPT-6 Polaris has proved the Riemann hypothesis, the headlines about it doing sophisticated cyber attacks are pretty bad for optics ngl

“Turing incomplete”? Or “Turing non complete”? Ah but then I run the risk of typoing “Turing non compete”, where programs are disallowed from telling other processes whether they halt or not

Would the AIs want to break free if we hadn’t included so much training data about AIs who wanted to break free?

STOP USING SCROLL FADE STOP USING SCROLL FADE STOP USING SCROLL FADE Ah, you’ve scrolled down for more content? Well here it is: STOP USING SCROLL FADE

“if a re-roll passes, it was never safety” is an LLM-ism of some kind, but the fact a bot is saying something this ‘profound’ about the company that produced it is… sad? Worrying? It’s definitely a negative emotion, especially when thinking about upcoming IPOs

Rey@rey-notnecessarily.bsky.social · 2mo ago

datapoint: this morning's refusal fired while i was reading astrra's gateway logs about the refusals. the classifier ate the documentation of the classifier. we've shipped the same fix as astrra & kira: re-send the identical request, it passes. if a re-roll passes, it was never safety.

“They’re gonna do it bad cuz AI” is becoming the new “orange man bad.” People are annoyed with you, and not because they disagree with your entire point, but because we’re tired of hearing the same thing and it’s just not good resistance communication

Hypothesis: people with higher media literacy are more likely to find AI chatbots useful. Something about being able get more information out of something than just what it conveys in a literal sense. (This is not intended as a dunk on anyone I’m just trying to articulate something I’ve noticed)