The Last Visible Dog

@thelastinstance.bsky.social

I just want to see the little guy on top writing: https://codepoetics.substack.com plugins: https://vulpuslabs.com music: https://wtrem.bandcamp.com

My neighbor told me crises keep eating his unflinching diagnoses so I asked how many diagnoses he has and he said he just goes to the shelter and gets a new diagnosis afterwards so I said it sounds like he’s just feeding unflinching diagnoses to crises and then his daughter started crying.

Dope, a meme chamber@dannybirchall.bsky.social · 2w ago

sometimes when I get yet another email promoting an 'unflinching diagnosis of our current crisis' I'm given to wonder whether Verso Books might not actually be behind the current crises so they can sell more diagnoses.

Related to what I was kvetching about earlier, and also to something @deontologistics.bsky.social has been kvetching about for a long while - there are lots of seductive argumentative moves that deliver effective zingers but degrade the ability to think clearly and critically about one's own posture

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò@olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 2w ago

personally I think making your side of any dispute think worse for the tasty mcvibes of putting down an out group is rarely a good trade off, unless you have extremely powerful propaganda tech at your disposal or don't need your side's brains for anything later

The Internet going berserk about this is a predictable consequence of the wave of highly moralised genderslop we've been soused by for what seems like forever. There is a class of persons deemed axiomatically unworthy of consideration, which makes them juicy targets for untrammelled ressentiment

Post nicht verfügbar.

I honestly wonder how much of the language policing around LLMs is just failure to appreciate how metonymy works. I just don't think that "Microsoft wants me to log in", "Brussels will capitulate" and "Claude said it's false" carry the ontological commitments their grammar might suggest.

What Rawlsianism-by-force qctually gets you is a system that satisfies a broad majority and locks outliers in with no cogent opportunity for voice and no legal route to exit. Also of course the exact thing we have in the UK, which is de facto selection purely on the basis of housing affordability

William B. Fuckley@opinionhaver.bsky.social · 3w ago

An edcuation policy soloution that would get you killed by angry parents but also fix like 60% of problems after a couple of generations is children being randomly assigned a public school within ten miles of their house. That is the school you attend and you cannot transfer.

Musk is an interesting outlier, I really don't see a conversion to paleo-Catholic-LARPology in his future. He has an apocalyptic worldview, but it's pure race war stuff. I don't think he even really cares about Mars any more, because there's no race war to be had there

aly@aly.codes · 3w ago

strongly dislike the implication that being an atheist makes you of inferior moral standing such that it entails being a chud, or, in the elision popular these days, a fascist. all the fascists are religious nutjobs and their friends in this country