These Islands

@theseislands.bsky.social

These Islands is a forum for debate standing unabashedly for the view that more unites the people of the United Kingdom than divides them.

1/ “We have 110% of our energy needs already met by renewables.” “Scotland has the highest sources of renewable energies in Europe.” No surprise to discover that two newly elected Scottish Green MSPs fully believe in debunked myths about energy in Scotland.

John Swinney’s pledge on energy bills at this election is simply fraudulent. He knows that it won’t be properly scrutinised. And he doesn’t care that it’s undeliverable. But voters should care about a candidate for First Minister who doesn’t tell the truth.

Bild

1/ This line, that because a Chinese company has a minority stake in Hinkley Point C, the UK Labour government must be “anti-Scottish” to have blocked the Ming Yang wind turbine factory, on national security grounds, is very easily debunked.

This is really important. The SNP, and many supporters of independence, keep making the argument that Scotland's renewables would bring down the price of electricity in an independent Scotland, and imply that the current system is unfair to Scots. This analysis blows that argument out of the water.

How to interrogate SNP energy bills claim

How to demonstrate that the SNP is not telling the truth about energy bills and Scotland’s “low-cost” renewables. A step-by-step guide.

these-islands.co.uk

Gillian Martin said she’d get back to me on how the “third off electricity bills with independence” claim is consistent with the actual costs of Scottish offshore wind (see quoted post). When I chased this up, her officials fobbed me off. The answer is *not* in the SNP paper.

Bild
Sam Taylor@staylorish.bsky.social · 9mo ago

Listen to Gillian Martin’s response when asked to explain how the SNP’s “third off electricity bills with independence” claim is consistent with the actual costs of Scottish offshore wind. “That’s a dissertation question. I’ll need to get back to you on that.”

John Swinney blames “hyperinflation” for the SNP’s failure to keep its 2021 promise to freeze income tax rates and bands. John Swinney obviously doesn’t know what hyperinflation means.

1/ Pro-independence organisation submits an FOI request to Scot Gov about bonds plan. Civil servants offer to meet with them because the cost limit exemption is likely to apply. So… I asked for a meeting about the same subject, with the same civil servants… and was rebuffed. 🤔

Bild

1/ Inconvenient. The SNP piloted a very similar policy in 2019-2021 (the First Home Fund). The evaluation report concluded that it didn’t work: “marginal first-time buyers struggling to access home ownership do not form the majority of FHF buyers.”

The finding that rate of additionality is less than a third is supported by other evidence. That average income, LTV and LTI ratios of FHF buyers are similar to those of the average first-time buyer across Scotland, and the average price of a property purchased through the FHF is greater than the average price of a property purchased by all first-time buyers across Scotland, suggests that marginal first-time buyers struggling to access home ownership do not form the majority of FHF buyers. This is consistent with the finding that a majority (63.9%) of FHF buyers reported that the scheme had enabled them to buy a larger property, and that a majority (58.1%) also reported that the scheme had enabled them to use less of their savings for their deposit.
John Swinney@johnswinney.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Too many young people are stuck in the rent trap and can't afford a home of their own. If re-elected, the SNP Government will help first-time buyers with up to £10,000 towards their deposit - unlocking home ownership for a new generation in Scotland.

Scot Gov yesterday snuck out a “written authority” for the purchase of Ardrossan Harbour. This is an exchange of letters in which a senior civil servant states that an action cannot be justified on value for money grounds, and a Scot Gov minister directs them to proceed anyway.

BildBild

Typically wrongheaded analysis from Common Weal. It is because renewable resources are unlimited, and everyone has them, that they are *less* valuable to Scotland’s economy than oil and gas were.

We see here that Scotland is in the process of losing out once again when it comes to energy resources that, if anything, vastly outstrip anything the oil sector could have ever promised because, unlike oil, the sun and the wind will continue to deliver that energy long after the last barrel of oil is extracted from the ground.

Challenged with real-world evidence of the true cost of Scottish renewables, Gillian Martin responds by witlessly reciting the “low-cost renewables” mantra. There is no evidence to support this claim, because it simply isn’t true.

Bild

1/🚨The Scottish Government *paid* for the credit ratings obtained last year from Moody’s and S&P. But we are not allowed to know how much it paid, because “disclosure may affect the commercial interests of Moody's and S&P”.

Bild

This. And it would do the pro-Indy lobby good if they were to make the effort to understand these issues properly and to stop misleading the public on the issue. ("Ewwww, Taylor, he's a yoooooon" is not a good reason for not trying to understand renewables.)

Sam Taylor@staylorish.bsky.social · 9mo ago

Glib assertions about Scotland having won the energy lottery twice over - first with oil and now with renewables - are not just false. They are actively harmful.

The politics of net zero will be pivotal to Scotland's economic performance over the next five years.
If the government is to play a helpful role, politicians (from all parties) must learn how to think about return on capital - perhaps the most important but least understood concept in the politics of energy in Scotland.
We are moving from high return on capital businesses - oil and gas - to low return on capital businesses - renewables. The energy transition, and Scotland's opportunities on that journey, cannot be properly understood without grasping the significance of this point. Glib assertions about Scotland having won the energy lottery twice over - first with oil and now with renewables - are not just false. They are actively harmful.
Renewables are a good thing, but they are not a lottery-style windfall. The sooner politicians appreciate this, the better our chances of achieving the fabled just transition.

This is the sort of thing that can happen when any party spends too long in power: the boundary between party and government (never 100% sharp, I suspect) becomes far too blurred.

Sam Taylor@staylorish.bsky.social · 9mo ago

1/ Short 🧵 on how the civil service in Scotland has been corrupted by Scottish nationalism. Last August, Scot Gov published a news release alongside the GERS figures which was so misleading, the Director of @fraserofallander.org called it “egregious” and “out of order”.

1/ Short 🧵 on how the civil service in Scotland has been corrupted by Scottish nationalism. Last August, Scot Gov published a news release alongside the GERS figures which was so misleading, the Director of @fraserofallander.org called it “egregious” and “out of order”.

The civil servants in the Constitutional Futures Division spent three years working on independence papers, and never made any attempt to estimate the impact of independence on energy bills in Scotland. The reason is obvious: they knew the answer would be inconvenient.

Bild

2/ For about the millionth time: renewables are a low return on capital business. The energy transition, and Scotland’s opportunity on that journey, cannot be understood without fully grasping the significance of this point.

Infinite and Everywhere

The journey to net zero means leaving behind the fossil fuel era, and moving towards a world which will power itself by capturing energy from super-abundant resources. This has profoundly important co...

these-islands.co.uk