thezero

@thezero.org

Human Rights Defender @osservatorionessuno.org. Security Researcher @shielder.com. Former KeepassXC maintainer. Computer Repair With A Smile. thezero.org

before agentic coding: *writes code* *doesn't release* *gets busy, reviews a month later* what the fuck who wrote this over-complicated shit after agentic coding: *has robot write code* *doesn't release* *gets busy, reviews a month later* what the fuck who wrote this over-complicated shit

FWIW, Meta was fully aware of how these glasses would primarily be used. The glasses were designed to erase consent, and that is why they exist. Anything that they do that suggests they want to ameliorate this use is an attempt to win the PR battle and manipulate public opinion.

Meta Desperately Trying to Ban Creeps Misusing Its AI "Pervert Glasses"

Meta is vowing to crack down on creeps misusing its Ray Ban smart glasses. Whether it will be enough to regain trust remains to be seen.

futurism.com

i remember landline phones having cords so strong you could stretch them across the entire great wall of china and they would still work, meanwhile modern usb cords rip if you look at them wrong

Quite the headline. If the economy relies on our Tech breaking and us buying new tech regularly, doesn't that incentivize planned obsolescence by these Tech companies? The answer is Yes. Yes it does. 👇🏽 How device hoarding by Americans is costing economy share.google/MmiMtugbsfYQ...

Americans are holding onto devices longer than ever and it's costing the economy

Americans are holding onto devices longer than ever before, and while it may be consumer smart, it comes at a cost to work productivity and the U.S. economy.

share.google

For many years, people didn’t randomly film others in public—not because we didn’t have the technology, but because the social contract said you didn’t do that. That’s why Meta is going full court press on their PR and celebrity endorsements. They remember how people ran google glass outta town.

NEW: I spoke to several offensive cybersecurity researchers, including zero-day developers, about how the guardrails imposed by OpenAI and Anthropic on AI models are impeding their work. Most complained the guardrails are inconsistent and too strict, which pushes them to use open source models.

How AI guardrails are impeding the work of offensive cybersecurity researchers | TechCrunch

We spoke with several cybersecurity researchers, who look for unknown vulnerabilities and develop tools to exploit them, about how OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s guardrails affect their work.

techcrunch.com

The New York Times ran some tests to see if AI could replace an office worker and realized the fundamental flaw of LLM-based AI agents; they don’t follow instructions. The funny thing is how often AI bros excuse this by saying humans aren’t good at following instructions either. Computers got worse

Bild

Zero-day startup Paradigm Shift took down the blog post and corresponding Proof-of-Concept code for the iPhone flaw they dubbed Usbliter8. Takedown comes following a judge order in the lawsuit filed by Magnet Forensics, which alleges a former employee now at the startup stole the flaw.

Bild

NSO Group spent at least $67,500 on lobbying 🇺🇸Congress and U.S. federal agencies in Q1 and Q2 of 2026, through its executive chairman, David Friedman – the former US ambassador to Israel – according to the latest lobbying disclosure filings.

BildBild

somehow I only recently learned that LLMs need the whole conversation fed back to them on each prompt so their i/o cost scales as O(n^2), something that would be considered completely unacceptable in almost any other production network-accessible software

Do you know how we label a software that escapes a sandbox, exploits a third-party infrastructure, pwn it, gathers information and data on their servers, etc. A malware. And do you know who is responsible for the damages made by it? The malware operator.

New: Public records show how a city that ended its Flock contract spent months trying to get the company to remove the cameras or turn off the cameras. They were told Flock "objects" to the city removing the camera itself. Eventually city put trash bags over them: www.404media.co/flock-object...

Flock ‘Objects to Our Removing Their Equipment’: Emails Reveal Why a Town Put Bags Over Its Flock Cameras

"For the time being, if you or someone on your crew has availability to secure black plastic bags (or something else) over the cameras, that would be great."

404media.co

Most popular smart watches and fitness trackers aren't end-to-end encrypted, nor say how often governments demand access to users' data. My argument: If wearable makers don't want to disclose that they're turning over users' data to the feds, then the obvious fix is to end-to-end encrypt it.

Most fitness wearables lack end-to-end encryption and don't disclose government data demands, says EFF

Most fitness wearables don't use end-to-end encryption to protect users' health information, leaving open the door for government demands for data.

this.weekinsecurity.com

The Pentagon is withholding causality and hit numbers. The CDC is withholding infection rates. The FDA is withholding information about food contamination. The EPA is withholding pollution and climate data. This corrupt administration is ALL about concealing the consequences of its incompetence.