Timothy Burke

@timothyburke.bsky.social

Professor of History at Swarthmore College. Writes at timothyburke.substack.com, continuing from his old blog Easily Distracted. Remembers when there was no Internet, and stays up late because someone is wrong on it.

Thinking on the wasted energies poured into various forms of "digital literacy" since the late 1990s, since many of them aimed to produce knowledge of and comfort with tools, interfaces and procedures that were often obsoleted within 4-5 years. Learning "prompting" is only the latest fool's errand.

A long time ago--it feels like a lifetime ago--I really thought that following rules and procedurals was how you got ethically and empirically better outcomes, by and large. That was fundamentally wrong. Rules mean nothing if some players disregard them and no one enforces them.

Let's also say this about NYT and other press sanewashing of Trump and his administrators. Sanewashing involves imagining, inventing, creating things not said in public. It involves imagining continuities between past policy and current actions that don't exist and have been disavowed. It is a lie.

My basic response on "civility" is: "ok, you first." And not just tomorrow, but for something like a year. Or two. Or a lifetime. Respect and restraint are the ultimate in reciprocal values. You do them or you don't get them. And that's more than what you say, it's what you do.

Ok, I'm honestly amused by a Reddit thread where professors are saying they miss "Since time immemorial..." and "In today's society" and "Thusly" and "In our modern society" and other hallmarks of undergraduate writing in days of yore.

Trump's "art of the deal" has always been about "negotiating for the right to save face after losing catastrophically on a dumb gamble, followed by furiously jumping into another investment so as to erase the memory of the last loss". That's his career. Nothing has changed.

There are so many things that will need changing if we survive this moment. Among them is that if you have a constitutional court, it has to have a procedural workflow that kicks in INSTANTLY on a government action that might be unconstitutional. Wait a year or two and you might as well not bother.

I would have said twenty years ago or so that the most dangerous thing any political leadership can do is to take away something swiftly from people who've had it for a while. I'm waiting in 2026 for that insight to kick in, given how many people have had things taken away by Trumpism.

I'm preparing an "archive pack" for students in my History of the Future class for a late-semester assignment, and one is on space colonies. I just found a 2010 book on lunar settlement that includes a chapter on making sure there are HR professionals in any moonbase. Somehow this amuses me.

I'm trying really hard but I just cannot shake that the ostensible leader of my own country has said that he intends to obliterate an entire civilization tonight. Whether or not it's just bombast, or it's just an exaggeration of "I'm going to bomb infrastructure", it's profoundly unacceptable.

I go out of my mind when I see a confession that a review of a film, book or play for one of the few remaining daily newspapers was done w/AI. It's not fucking hard! You are one of the last people standing in that gig! There are 10,000 people who could do what you're doing and do it beautifully!

Bret Stephens: We've only bombed ONE girls' school. In other wars we bombed weddings, schools, supportive villages, we murdered parents in front of their children, we tortured people in prisons. This war is going MUCH better.

A hat trick here of complaints about the NYT. One of the things that is really shining through now in their stage-management of the news to provide a positive reframing of Trumpland is the feedback loop between the NYT and think tanks where both parties are trying to "speak with and for power".

Speaking of the NYT, they're also ON IT when it comes to remorselessly fact-checking world leaders. Turns out Spain's Prime Minister is...kind of right that Spain's use of renewables is providing them with some energy security. This for some reason is a news story that needs to be in today's mix.

Trump did this and Trump did that, but don't worry, the New York Times is ON IT. It turns out--surprise!--that what Trump did for Trump's reasons is actually (drumroll) consistent with long-term American policy priorities! According to think tanks desperate to remain relevant, that is.

About organizational cultures, especially those that mean to be in confrontation with dominant systems. Here's the thing: if we can't make that organization express the world we want to live in, then maybe that tells us a lot about the world we're in. But it's not an excuse or a justification.

There are at least three overlapping conditions of state-lines: 1) The “performative” (aesthetic) state — the state as bullshit 2) The banausic state — the state as bureaucracy 3) The occluded (“deep”) state — the state as secrecy