I picked up almost as much from the library as I did from school—real history, not that polished nonsense we were fed!
Tuhin Chakrabarty
@tuhinchakr.bsky.social
Assistant Prof @sbucompsc @stonybrooku. Researcher → @SFResearch Ph.D. → @ColumbiaCompSci Human Centered AI / Future of Work / AI & Creativity
When a model writes, where do its words come from? Are they new, or do they match exactly with language it saw in training? An AI-writing detector can't tell you. @tuhinchakr.bsky.social's group at Stony Brook has been dissecting AI-generated prose with our infini-gram engine. 🧵
Very grateful to @ai2.bsky.social for tools like OLmO Trace and Infingram for helping us to draw the boundary between whats human written and whats ripped off from the training data 😈
When a model writes, where do its words come from? Are they new, or do they match exactly with language it saw in training? An AI-writing detector can't tell you. @tuhinchakr.bsky.social's group at Stony Brook has been dissecting AI-generated prose with our infini-gram engine. 🧵
Echoes @vtanger.bsky.social premonition !!
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
If you're going to cite that NBER report from OpenAI about "how people use AI," you've got to at least caveat it. We have no way to directly verify most of the report, and we do have at least one good reason, via indirect evidence and quoted below, to not trust it. www.nber.org/papers/w34255
Not the point of the OP, but I was curious and took a closer look at this 2025 piece from OpenAI. Much could be said, but it fails my go-to test for all of these pieces about "how people actually use AI": the tokens "sex" "erotic" and "NSFW" do not appear in the paper.
Big news today: GERMAN COURT RULES AI MUSIC FIRM SUNO BROKE COPYRIGHT RULES Suno "has to provide information on illicit revenue", and "will have to pay damages". Wow. www.reuters.com/world/german...
this is a deep cut! i wrote that in 2017. bhaskar's full thread is worth reading
When we talk about Big Tech, let us remember as @willoremus.com eloquently puts it "society does not prepend the label “Big,” with a capital “B,” to an industry out of respect or admiration. It does it out of loathing and fear—and in preparation for battle.' 12/
More accusations of AI usage in books published by Big 5 publishers. Trying to wrap my mind around how to even begin to take precautions.
Trying to push back here as the first author of the paper. Please do not politicize and make it about race. Pangram doesn’t flag authors based on race. Put Octavia Butler, Roxane Gay, chimamanda ngozi adichie and it will not flag them as AI. Don’t blame me for your lack of understanding of AI.
That article from The Atlantic plays into so many garbage narratives at once -Black woman must be cheating if her book is popular -Romance novels are formulaic -AI is to be believed always, humans are lying Congratulations to that publication and article author on being terrible. Good job.
Chatbots being extremely good at scams is in some ways just a logical extension of the entire project of building machines that can pass for humans
Scam researchers told a Claude agent and human "scammers" to text test subjects and build a relationship. After a week, subjects said they trusted the AI more than the human and almost half were willing to install an app at its request. Almost none detected it was AI. www.wired.com/story/ai-sca...
How AO3 and Heated Rivalry fanfiction communities are dealing with the encroachment of AI-generated writing. h/t @tuhinchakr.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/2026/07/30/t...
When A.I. Invaded ‘Heated Rivalry’ Fan Fiction, the Meltdown Was Epic (Gift Article)
An anonymous X account posted a detailed breakdown of chatbot text in 38 popular stories inspired by the hockey romance. The fandom spiraled.
nytimes.com
@barackobama.bsky.social ‘s summer reading list was better than the Booker Longlist #changemyview
As @vauhinivara.bsky.social prophesied! The new playbook for writers whose work shows signs of AI is to simply deny it. www.theatlantic.com/books/2026/0...
This Literary AI Scandal Changes Everything
A magazine’s response to accusations of publishing AI-generated fiction points to a new phase in the struggle to keep literature human.
theatlantic.com
The biggest difference between the scandal over Shy Girl being partly AI-generated and the new allegations over Daggermouth seems to be that the Shy Girl author acknowledged AI involvement (tho blamed someone else) while the Daggermouth author denies it. So now what? Nice @willoremus.com piece.
The biggest difference between the scandal over Shy Girl being partly AI-generated and the new allegations over Daggermouth seems to be that the Shy Girl author acknowledged AI involvement (tho blamed someone else) while the Daggermouth author denies it. So now what? Nice @willoremus.com piece.
Is This What Comes After AI Slop?
Daggermouth could be the first best-selling novel partly written by a chatbot.
theatlantic.com
A glut of AI-written fiction is drowning out human authors, new research shows. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/28/b...
Very telling research on the rise of self-published books with substantial AI text - which on their own earn less than 'regular' books, but together seem to earn their 'authors' substantial and are thus crowding out the market for others:
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
For some people in literary studies, the take-away point here will be less about AI, and more "tell me again how you matched titles to sales figures?" 👀 That can be broadly useful data.
How we did it: we sampled 14,419 self-published genre fiction ebooks (low barriers, little gatekeeping) and ran Pangram on the full text, labeling each substantial AI (>25%), light AI (<25%) or none. Then we matched each 📖 to a Big5 publisher's daily sales feed: 3 years of day-by-day sales. (2/n)
Including evidence that AI Slop takes revenue from real authors. The key long term effect --- human authors, already facing long odds, leaving the scene entirely --- will be devastating for literature (as it will be for music and other arts).
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
Incredibly important new research published today shows the huge impact AI books are having on real writers’ ability to make a living. Looking at self-published books on Amazon, they found: - 20% of self-published books include substantial AI text - ... 🧵 1/3
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
This is a very interesting thread. I’m surprised how well rare phrase use distinguishes AI/human text.
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
This is a really interesting thread.
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
The real contribution of AI— Truth & poetry die in irrelevance. Very convenient for those who hate truth & poetry. Authors vie for sustenance in an environment in which noise overwhelms signal. Derivative mediocrity becomes the norm. This is the path to our slow death through suffocation. #resist
Here's the imbalance at the heart of the paper. Over 3 years, the books catalog grew 38x cumulatively. The book's revenue? Only 9x quarterly. Way more books fighting over a pie that barely grew which means the average book earns less than it used to. (4/n)
A must read thread for anyone thinking about the socio-cultural and economic effects of generative AI. Huge thanks to Tuhin & his fellow researchers for their amazing work here. And as Tuhin notes, there are significant legal implications given the clear market dilution resulting from AI content.
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
Paper thread behind @willoremus.com ‘s terrific Atlantic reporting 👇 For those interested
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
🚨 New paper on AI & Copyright Using @pangram.com full-text AI detection, we study self-published genre fiction on Amazon, 2023–26. Amazon is flooded w/ books with substantial AI text. They earn real 💰 & crowd out non-AI books. w/ @dhillonp.bsky.social @xinyuel.bsky.social & Jane Ginsburg (1/n) 🧵
“AI writing can be lucrative, but only if it’s kept secret. Eventually, something’s got to give.”
AI-assisted fiction is already here, tons of people are reading it, very few of them realize it, and no one wants to talk about it. Gift link to my latest: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
AI-assisted fiction is already here, tons of people are reading it, very few of them realize it, and no one wants to talk about it. Gift link to my latest: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Is This What Comes After AI Slop?
Daggermouth could be the first best-selling novel partly written by a chatbot.
theatlantic.com
Really enjoyed speaking to @willoremus.com about new work on market dilution caused by books with substantial AI text in them. My favorite part of this experience was to find evidence in the form of hyperspecific rare expressions from a given AI book under scrutiny that also occurs in other books.
AI-assisted fiction is already here, tons of people are reading it, very few of them realize it, and no one wants to talk about it. Gift link to my latest: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
"If a book as beloved as Daggermouth were written with a chatbot, it would raise an awkward question: Could AI fiction be getting … good?" Fascinating one by @willoremus.com www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Is This What Comes After AI Slop?
Daggermouth could be the first best-selling novel partly written by a chatbot.
theatlantic.com