Valentin Mang

@valentinmang.bsky.social

Postdoc @ESRI.ie | social psych/behavioural science, misinformation, conspiracy beliefs (he/him) #firstgen

Check out this recent @nature.com paper reporting a field experiment on X. It shows X's algorithm boosts conservative content and downranks traditional media—shifting users’ views on key issues. Switching to chronological doesn’t reverse the effect. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

The political effects of X’s feed algorithm - Nature

Among users initially on a chronological feed, 7 weeks of exposure to X’s algorithmic feed in 2023 shifted political attitudes and account-following behaviour in a more conservative direction compared...

nature.com

A new paper by George Borjas—who served this past year in the Trump White House designing some of its anti-immigration policies—claims to display evidence of ideological bias among researchers who study immigration. doi.org/10.1126/scia... 🧵 Thread—>

Bild

At ZPID we are searching for a tenure track assistant professor for Psychological Metascience in joint appointment with @unitrier.bsky.social preferably someone who has conducted quantitative research in metascience in psychology or related disciplines. Questions? Feel free to contact me personally.

Post nicht verfügbar.

“Bypassing” is a promising strategy for countering misinformation by sharing truthful, positively framed statements instead of direct corrections. New research shows it can correct misperceptions effectively, especially when people are still open to learning. www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/misg...

Is There a Better Way to Fight Misinformation?

What if the best way to counter misinformation isn’t arguing facts, but offering better truths instead?

psychologytoday.com

This statement from the NSF is insane. Science is, in essence, designed to separate the true from the false. Understanding how falsehoods spread is key to the scientific endeavor. It is not a violation of free speech to be proven wrong.

Bild

🚨New paper alert🚨 How do different "Great Replacement" conspiracy narratives (blaming relatively powerful left-wing elites or relatively powerless Muslim communities) affect radical collective action intentions against different targets across the political spectrum? A 🧵 about what we found:

Hakan Çakmak@hakancakmak.bsky.social · last yr.

Our registered report with @valentinmang.bsky.social and @feitenglong.bsky.social has now been published in BJSP! We examined the radicalizing effects of different Great Replacement conspiracy narratives (Muslim vs. left-wing conspirators). See the link for the paper: doi.org/10.1111/bjso...

Great to see this paper being accepted! @hakancakmak.bsky.social and @feitenglong.bsky.social made working on this project a pleasure! If you are interested in how different Great Replacement conspiracy narratives shape hostility against Muslims and political elites, DM one of us for the preprint.

Hakan Çakmak@hakancakmak.bsky.social · 2y ago

The first paper of the new year has been accepted for publication in BJSP! This work is in collaboration with the brilliant @valentinmang.bsky.social and @feitenglong.bsky.social. Feel free to contact me if you're interested in the preprint version.

New paper alert! In this new publication in advances.in/psychology, I systematically reviewed the literature on source credibility effects in misinformation research together with my supervisors Bob Fennis and @kaiepstude.bsky.social. A short summary of the highlights of the paper:

Advances.in@advances.in · 2y ago

🔊New in advances.in/psychology: "Source credibility effects in misinformation research: A review and primer" by Mang, Fennis, & Epstude This systematic review unravels the complex role of source credibility in misinformation contexts. advances.in/psychology/1...