Vincent Planche

@vincentplanche.bsky.social

Professor of Neurology, Bordeaux University - Head of Memory Clinic, Bordeaux University Hospital

Interpreting p-tau-17 results depends on characterizing the clinical phenotype. Positive predictive value in those w/ subjective cognitive impairment was only 60%. It was 90% in those with MCI & a typical Alzheimer phenotype. Important to consider before widespread use of blood-based biomarkers.

Vincent Planche@vincentplanche.bsky.social · 2y ago

Happy to share the work of Vincent Bouteloup, which has just been published in JAMA Neurology and presented this morning at the AD/PD Conference! jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...

AD and PD, same battle! Biology, yes, but not in isolation from clinical practice! Happy to share David Bendetowicz paper: Biological definitions of synucleinopathies should be anchored in clinical trajectories and encompass the complex biology of the disease journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

There are many reasons why the suggestion to abandon examining our patients in behavioral neurology is a bad idea. One that is often overlooked regarding bedside cognitive screening, is that it allows the family to appreciate the level of mental functioning. #endalz pn.bmj.com/content/earl...

Cognitive screening instruments: time for retirement

Cognitive screening instruments are used daily in clinics devoted to the assessment of cognitive disorders and also in general neurology clinics where patients with complaints of memory disorder may b...

pn.bmj.com