Andrew Kniss

@wyoweeds.bsky.social

I kill things for science (mostly plants). I study crops, weeds, and sometimes other things at a University in Wyoming (but this is a personal account). I like taking photos and writing #Rstats code, but not at the same time. PlantOutOfPlace.com

Every year I feed some of my class assignments into the most recent (free) versions of the chatbots, just to see what I should expect if students do the same. The chatbot got a 50% on an upcoming plant ID quiz, which seems to me like a skill it should be good at by this point.

Conservatives in 2026 are like: “When we said Barack Obama was like Hitler we meant it as a metaphor for something bad, not a reference to real Hitler who we think is cool but not in a way that lets you say we’re racist.”

I've now recieved a rejected manuscript review where a reviewer submitted LLM-generated content (100% confident), and a rejected grant review where a reviewer submitted LLM-generated content (80% confident). On it's own, this is somewhere between frustrating and infuriating. But my main concern:

A lot of the discussions about AI in academia have focused on students, grading, etc. But I think there is even more of a problem in academic research... Just had a manuscript clearly "peer" reviewed by an LLM. And who knows how many AI written and AI reviewed grants are in the system.

Pleased to see our work published: The Ties That Bind: Computational, Cross-cultural Analyses of Knots Reveal Their Cultural Evolutionary History and Significance We analysed knots across 12,000 years and 82 societies. Time to tie a thread 🧵 about why knots matter. doi.org/10.1017/S095...

A circular dendrogram (phenetic tree) of knots, made using the ggtree package in R. A text-readable and high-resolution PDF-version of the tree is available as a supplementary material.

When grant programs are posted only 6 weeks before the deadline, but then funding decisions aren't announced for another 9+ months, it really makes managing a research program stressful...

There's an OMB rule change that would require political oversight of scientific grants, and could pull any that don't "reflect presidential priorities" Another country has tried this before! It was the USSR and it was called Lysenkoism. By @thsaey.bsky.social www.sciencenews.org/article/omb-...

Here’s what happens when you put politicians in charge of science

Proposed federal rules would rely on political appointees to decide how a lot of U.S. science gets done. History shows the consequences of such actions.

sciencenews.org

How are other academics dealing with the "Countries of Concern" disclosures when submitting Federal grants? My institution is asking me for a list of Co-PIs from the list of countries, and I have no interest in playing that game... Am I alone here? #adademicsky