Is it possible to change belief in free will with a quick manipulation? Answer seems to be: There is only an effect if you measure free will belief *immediately* after the manipulation… no effect if you measure free will belief even *a few minutes later* www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Experimental Philosophy
@xphilosopher.bsky.social
An account for experimental philosophy - an interdisciplinary field at the intersection of philosophy and psychology https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_philosophy#:~:text=Experimental%20philosophy%20is%20an%20emerging,inform%20research%20on%20phi
You roll a fair die, hoping to get a 6. If you are successful, did you *intentionally* roll a 6? In a new paper, I explain why people hesitate to call lucky outcomes intentional:🧵 direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...
Philosophers of Bluesky, help! 🙏 Can you spare a few minutes to share your intuitions, and pass this along to colleagues who might not have seen it yet? #philsky moralsciencelab.com/intuitions/
intuitions-study | moral science lab
A study of philosophical intuitions
moralsciencelab.com
Philosophers, we need your help We are running a study on philosophers’ intuitions about thought experiments moralsciencelab.com/intuitions/ Only takes a few minutes!
Philosophers, we need your help We are running a study on philosophers’ intuitions about thought experiments moralsciencelab.com/intuitions/ Only takes a few minutes!
Confs: 6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference & Satellite Workshop on Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Linguistic Justice
Confs: 6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference & Satellite Workshop on Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Linguistic Justice
The 6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference will take place at the University of Cagliari from September 8th to 11th, 2026. It will consist of the Linguistic Justice Society Satellite Workshop “Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Linguistic Justice” on September 8th, followed by the main Conference on September 9th–11th. The event is generously supported by Gian Pietro Storari Funds, Dipartimento di Pedagogia, Psicologia, Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Fondazione di Sard
dlvr.it
Now out in Noûs: A communication-first account of explanation, with Jacqueline Harding (jacquelineharding.github.io) and Thomas Icard (stanford.edu/~icard/). Paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2505.03732
Suppose you are caught doing something bad, and you say: "Deep down in my truest self, I always knew it was wrong" Studies show that if you can get people to believe this, they will blame you less ... But why? Wouldn't it make sense for them to blame you MORE?
Getting Out of Blame: Excuses, Forgiveness, and the Deep Self
We often feel that what we have done is somehow not in keeping with who we are. This tension, or incongruity, between the person we take ourselves to be and what that person has done seems to matter ...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
My teenage daughter just interviewed cognitive scientist Phil Corlett (@philcorlett.bsky.social) www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe6r...
Philip Corlett on delusion formation, brain maps, and research disputes (advice for high schoolers!)
YouTube video by Medical Milliandra
youtube.com
This paper is so beautiful There's a complex debate on this topic that pits @tadegquillien.bsky.social's causal model theory vs. Carlotta Pavese, Paul Henne & Bob Beddor's know-how theory vs. @orifriedman.bsky.social's probability-based theory .... and the papers on all sides are just so, so good
Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Account
The orthodoxy in philosophy is that there’s no knowledge in “fake barn” cases But in a study of philosophers, the majority say that there *is* knowledge in fake barn cases How is it even possible for philosophical orthodoxy to come apart like this from what philosophers actually believe?
🔍 Postdoc opening on my ERC project ROBOCRIM Looking for someone with experience in experimental philosophy / experimental jurisprudence to study criminal law in the age of robots. 3 years, full-time, ~€3,585–4,375/month gross. 30 June 2026 📩 Link: praca.bip.uj.edu.pl/stanowiska-b...
Another installment in linguist @glasslelia.bsky.social’s beautiful series of papers on linguistic differences between good and bad This one’s about why “The dishes are clean” means that all the dishes are clean but “The dishes are dirty” doesn’t mean that all the dishes are dirty
snl-journal.org
After a long time, the work with @nathansen.bsky.social on the ordinary conception of the word 'racist' is officially alive on the internet! Get that beautifully typeset and carefully copyedited pdf—all 44 pages of gloriousness—at Ergo for FREEEEEEEEE! journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article...
Making sure you're not a bot!
journals.publishing.umich.edu
Time to tap that self-promotion sign. When we asked people what % of people can be reasonably called 'racist', the mean is ~30 on a 0-100 scale, with wide variation. Ordinary people don't seem to use 'racist' in a way that implies racists are vanishingly rare. philpapers.org/rec/HANMCI
The journal Cognition – arguably the top journal in cognitive science – has published *ninety-nine* experimental philosophy papers Clearly, experimental philosophy is now very well integrated into the broader field of cognitive science
Ever wondered which journals have published the most experimental philosophy over the last 25 years? Following the 'where to publish' guide, @rodrigodiazxphi.bsky.social and Max Bauer scraped PhilPapers to give an answer. Click to see which 25 journals publish the most x-phi! Link to our blogpost👇
People sometimes agree to seemingly teleological sentences like: "The sun produces light so that plants can photosynthesize" Does this mean that people literally think the sun produces light for that purpose? New paper in Cognition suggests the answer is No www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Sex differences in Knobe Effect: slightly stronger among women, more likely to attribute intentionality in harm scenario & less in help scenario; assign more blame in harm scenario across the board, regardless of whether they judged the action intentional.
Quantifying the Knobe effect: population-level patterns and heterogeneity analyses
An influential survey by Joshua Knobe (2003) indicates that the cognitive process ascribing intentionality to an agent is mediated by the perceived moral worth of the action. To assess the external...
tandfonline.com
True beauty vs true prettiness Research by Doran suggests words like ‘beautiful’ have a dual character—descriptive *and* normative—while ‘pretty’ does not (no need to be beautiful to have a beautiful soul; no ‘pretty soul’): buff.ly/7wtzXLl HT @xphilosopher.bsky.social
1. New paper with @cjmott.bsky.social now published in JEP: Applied! Pretty version here: psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-.... Full text here: columbiasamclab.weebly.com/uploads/5/9/.... More info in thread below. #PsychSciSky #SocialPsyc #CogPsyc
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
New experimental philosophy from @ryandoran.bsky.social on the concept of the beautiful Argues that the concept BEAUTIFUL is different in some fundamental respects from concepts like PRETTY For example, participants think you can say "true beauty" but not "true prettiness"
True Beauty
Abstract. What is the nature of the concept beauty? Does it differ fundamentally from nearby concepts such as prettiness? It is argued here that beauty, bu
academic.oup.com
The 6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference will be this time in Cagliari, Italy... and I have been told the call for papers is still open! sites.unica.it/6euroxphi/
6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference
sites.unica.it
Introducing - Where should I publish my x-phi? A new community resource for experimental philosophers, integrating info and metrics for choosing x-phi friendly journals. We'd love more community input and feedback. Check it out! xphi.net/2026/04/22/w... @philmoralpsych.bsky.social
Where should I publish my X-Phi? A new resource – The Experimental Philosophy Blog
xphi.net
New experimental philosophy paper by Eugen Fischer on the ordinary understanding of perception Philosophers have long debated two opposing views: direct realism and indirect realism. Which do people think is right? The key result: Many people endorse BOTH link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Direct or indirect realism? Assessing conflicting folk conceptions of vision - Synthese
Synthese - Longstanding philosophical debates about the nature of perception revolve around a clash between Direct Realist and Indirect Realist conceptions of vision. These deny and affirm,...
link.springer.com
How do people decide whether it’s wrong to harm a pig? A chimp? A baby? In the West, these judgments are based more on *experience* (being able to feel) than on *agency* (being able to think and act) New study finds that same pattern across other cultures journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Why do people love sad music? You probably wouldn't want a stranger to tell you how their life is falling apart... so why do you want a stranger to *sing* about how their life is falling apart? Cognitive scientist/opera singer Tara Venkatesan on recent experimental results about this puzzle
Why do we like sad art? From ancient tragedies to Sad Girl playlists, humans have been drawn to negative feelings in art for millennia. Combining her two areas of expertise, the cognitive scientist and operatic soprano Tara Venkatesan decided to find out why
Interview with philosopher/psychologist @felipedebrigard.bsky.social. Discusses his work, but also more personal aspects of his life Quotation here is about what it was like growing up during a very violent period in the history of Colombia www.whatisitliketobeaphilosopher.com#/felipe-de-b...
People sometimes say that an outcome was caused by two things. We might say Amy got sick because (a) There was cilantro in the soup *and* (b) Amy is allergic to cilantro Beautiful new theory of causal selection from @tadegquillien.bsky.social that explains why we sometimes select two causes
Plural Causes
Abstract. Causal selection is the process underlying our intuition that an outcome happened because of a given event, or that an event is the cause of an outcome. When a forest catches fire after a li...
direct.mit.edu
The *majority* of philosophy papers now cite at least some empirical data. Papers that do purely a priori philosophy are in a minority
Philosophy was mostly "armchair" in the mid-20th century—but it's not anymore! Philosophers have increasingly cited empirical sources and discussed empirical data and evidence. In fact, as of the 2020s, non-empirical philosophy has become the minority.
Very happy to invite you to the second online-talk in our series. This thursday, Josh Knobe and Ivar Hannikainen, 4pm, everyone welcome. Join Zoom Meeting uzh.zoom.us/j/6806768837... Meeting ID: 680 676 8837 Passcode: xphi123