YIMBY Democrats for America 🇺🇸🗽

@yimbydems.bsky.social

The Voice of Progressive Abundance. Build America. Defeat Fascism. Join us at The Festival of Progressive Abundance in Los Angeles from Friday January 30th to Sunday February 1st, 2026! https://progressiveabundance.com/

As Secretary of State Colin Powell warned President George W. Bush before the invasion of Iraq, “You are going to be the proud owner of 25 million people. You will own all their hopes, aspirations, and problems. You’ll own it all." It's known as the 'Pottery Barn Rule': You break it? You own it.

YIMBY Democrats for America 🇺🇸🗽@yimbydems.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Foreign policy is generally out of our scope, but we would simply recommend you make your plan for a nation's future *before* you kidnap its head of state. 🤷‍♂️

You can't just assign us candidates based on the characters you've invented for us in your head. 😂 You are certainly welcome to listen to 50+ hours of our podcast, though! You might be surprised... Or just do a little research into Zohran's deputy mayor, executive orders, & housing committee... 🤔

Caerdroia@caerdroia.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Mamdani is a socialist. He is not a liberal. Your guy was the rapist or the cop.

Seriously! Where's that progress we've been promised from Abundance, a policy you heard about less than a year ago from notoriously bigoted right-wingers like... Ezra Klein? Is this a riddle? Perhaps a kōan? We're intrigued & have a similar question for you: what is the sound of one hand clapping?

Koan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Caerdroia@caerdroia.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Liberals are right wing. How can abundance be "progressive" when it has resulted in no progress and when it is spearheaded by bigoted right wingers?

A socialist should love Abundance! (And one does.) You can't do socialism if you can't make stuff. Can't redistribute funds until you raise them. Can't build subsidized public housing if it's also blocked by zoning & neighbor vetoes. Can't get a 21st century FDR if The New New Deal would be illegal!

BildBild
@2fast2quick.bsky.social · 7mo ago

It makes no sense in pop politics world view of “socialism is when the government does things, capitalism is when the market does things”, but a regulation which protects rentier landlords is as unsocialist as a market which exploits workers

Which is exactly why adding more residents and their tax revenue can help to pay for sidewalks, pavements, and streetlights while also creating demand and political pressure for increased public transit? Let's let the grannies live in the "granny flats" and not do redlining-again-but-woke?

Alex Wenzel@alexwenzel.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Just to clarify, we’re discussing one of the lowest income neighborhoods in San Diego that was redlined, never had sidewalks, is partially paved, and is more than a mile from the train and is served by one hourly bus route.

Except that that's not actually in evidence in the article. There are no experts quoted evaluating sewage and draining, and there are no statistics cited. The article quotes folks nearby fretting about this and wondering why their headcanon doesn't determine other peoples' lives. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Alex Wenzel@alexwenzel.bsky.social · 7mo ago

It’s the lack of infrastructure to support the ADUs. Sewage/drainage, sidewalks, the road, and transit are all insufficient to support the existing residents. Under normal development processes, there would be impact fees and potentially other negotiated mitigations.

If more people need homes than there are homes, renters have to bid against each other, driving prices up like an auction as landlords collect. If there's more homes than people, landlords have to fight each other for renters or be left with nothing. It's musical chairs, and we're adding chairs.

Jesse Mortenson@jk9.bsky.social · 7mo ago

See at least two of those things - “dismantle the incumbent privileges that have pulled the ladder up” and “make landlords compete for us” - are nonsense phrases. There is no common-cultural meaning to those phrases, only the meaning you’re foisting on to them. This is what I’m saying

What infrastructure does this article claim is adversely affected by ADUs? It seems to be mostly about parking and traffic. Residents say the roads are poorly maintained, but that pre-dates the ADUs. We recommend the city use the revenue from new residents to fix the potholes -- an upgrade!

Alex Wenzel@alexwenzel.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Aiming for “less law” without carefully considering the socioeconomic context and the incentives in the economy broadly can backfire severely in a country as fundamentally unequal as ours. These ADUs will essentially be tenements because they’re the first investment in this neighborhood in decades.

Progressive Abundance means that if you want to make life affordable, lift everyone up, dismantle the incumbent privileges that have pulled the ladder up, make landlords compete for us, and actually fight climate change, then we've got a plan for you. Festival means it's going to be fun.

BildBildBildBild
Jesse Mortenson@jk9.bsky.social · 7mo ago

“festival of progressive abundance” is some of the dorkiest shit I’ve seen. What does that even mean.

Totally. For us, it illustrates that "deregulation" just means "less law." For example, most folks on the left would certainly like to "deregulate" abortion in the deep South! We're pretty locked in on surging the creation of homes, green energy, and public transit -- the rest is normal politics!

Alex Wenzel@alexwenzel.bsky.social · 7mo ago

I agree with you, which is why I’m cautiously optimistic since there are some names and institutions that I’ve seen on prior Abundance conference flyers that aren’t on this one. The difference is far more nuanced than “poison vs homes” though.

The thing about "deregulation" is that it very much matters whether what you are deregulating is corporations' ability to poison the water supply or everyone's ability to build apartment buildings -- including the government's ability to build public housing without nearby randos shouting it down!

Alex Wenzel@alexwenzel.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Still not convinced this concept will work or be able to avoid Trojan-horsing wholesale deregulation, but I guess it’s good that some of them are trying to make a version of it that explicitly doesn’t include AEI or creepy anti-union guys.