Zack Albert

@zalbert.bsky.social

Polisci prof. @ Brandeis U. Research on parties and polarization and elections. Glad there’s finally hockey here. Go Leafs Go!

Really excited to have this book in print. Thread on what we found when we studied small donors in American elections — much of which challenges popular understandings

Ray La Raja@raylaraja.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Small donors are often portrayed as the antidote to big money in politics. In Small Donors in U.S. Politics (@uchicagopress.bsky.social), @zalbert.bsky.social and I show the story is more complicated. They broaden participation—but aren't typical Americans, amplifying the most partisan voices.

Need some parenting advice. My four year old has been rampaging through the house smashing things with a baseball bat. He finally agreed to pause for 90 days. My instinct is to lavishly praise him for his foresight and restraint. But what would you do?

I bounce back and forth (much like trump on tariffs) between “there is no plan” and “the plan is self-enrichment via market manipulation”. The truth is probably that trump is dumb and likes tariffs (no plan) + those around him see opportunities in that to make money

Jeff Tiedrich@jefftiedrich.bsky.social · last yr.

do I have this right? Donald Trump is just going to crash the world economy every three months — and then pretend to save it, over and over, while his cronies rake in untold billions on his shameless market manipulation, is that it? fucking hell

Political scientists: please consider signing, and sharing with other political scientists, this petition, which expresses urgent concerns about threats to the balance of powers in the U.S. today. Hundreds have already signed.

Political scientists' statement on recent events

Please use this form to add your signature to the following statement. Note that we are only soliciting signatures from individuals with PhDs in political science. We, the undersigned, are political ...

urldefense.proofpoint.com

TRUMP: “I’m sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with them. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

Post nicht verfügbar.

I focused heavily on heritage in my forthcoming book and, while this is pretty gross, it doesn’t surprise me. They have long focused on shaping public opinion and popular perceptions, more so than any other think tank I examined. They are always advocating and only sometimes researching

Arno Rosenfeld@arnorosenfeld.bsky.social · 2y ago

Scoop: I obtained a confidential presentation outlining how a major conservative think tanks plans to go after volunteer editors on Wikipedia who it says are "abusing their position" and promoting antisemitism forward.com/news/686797/...

A few thoughts… 1) Genuinely impressive they spent that much that fast 2) There’s likely no way this could’ve been spent that would’ve changed the outcome. Spreading around to down ballot races maybe would’ve helped but there are stingy limits ($2k) on those transfers (except party cmtes) 1/2

The New York Times@nytimes.com · 2y ago

Vice President Kamala Harris spent a remarkable $1.5 billion in her hyper-compressed presidential campaign. But in the days since losing to Donald Trump, her operation has faced questions internally and externally over what exactly the money went toward. nyti.ms/3YW7rM9

Bluesky academics… Quote this & tell me: 1) a project you are working on & 2) an odd idea/theory you aren’t working on but keep thinking about 1) who are small donors, who do they support, & what are likely effects of reform? 2) ppl always been poorly informed but it’s now much worse/more impactful

Post nicht verfügbar.