ricky 🎶💜🍄

@0xpsilocyber.com

Cloud Security Response @ Google 🕵️‍♂️ Husband & dog / cat dad 🐕🐕‍🦺🐈‍⬛🐈 Gamer & Music nerd 🎵🎮 using this as a music / thought journal, always happy to chat about DFIR or SecOps stuff, dm me.

hi friends, i’ve written part 1 of my infosec journey, i’ll add more pages as i get time. this was mainly a writing exercise for me, but its a question i am asked often. so here it is, how i got started in Infosec. 0xpsilocyber.com/infosec/welc...

My Path into Infosec -- Part 1

Greetings & Special Thanks ℹ️ Heads Up: I write specifically keeping editing to a minimum. There are likely spelling, grammatical mistakes. I prefer to keep my thoughts as close to raw as possible, an...

0xpsilocyber.com

After several years of studying I think I might *finally* know as much as y'all thought I did 10 years ago... If you're struggling with Imposter Syndrome: my love and support my friend. It gets us all. Here's to the next decade of study! #MakeKindnessNormal

Couldn’t agree more. The only meaningful use of GenAI I’ve seen in malicious cyber activity from state-nexus or eCrime is in persona construction. The idea that AI is somehow going to create god-tier malware (or some similar huge tradecraft innovation) is entirely detached from operational reality.

—>realhackhistory.org@bsky.realhackhistory.org · last yr.

I love Wired in many ways but this is nonsense, ransomware groups do just fine with phishing, stolen credentials and known vulnerabilities that haven’t been patched. This notion that attackers are going to seriously take up using GenAI just isn’t evidenced anywhere I’ve seen.

=
WIRED
YOU'RE
三=
NOT READY
IN THE NEAR FUTURE
one hacker may be able to unleash 20 zero-day attacks on different systems across the world all at once.
Polymorphic malware could rampage across a codebase, using a bespoke generative Al system to rewrite itself as it learns and adapts. Armies
FOR AI
HACKER AGENTS