😶 stuart reeves 😶

@5tuartreeves.bsky.social

ACADEMIC PERSON @UoNComputerSci, @UniOfNottingham, @TheOfficialMRL + @HorizonDER ❑ RESEARCH COMBINES HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (#HCI) + ETHNOMETHODOLOGY (#EMCA)

if you are doing human* centred research on/with technology (e.g. HCI), funding frequently becomes entangled with big tech in one way or another - this interview is a nice reminder of what we're up against (*person, social, more-than-human, etc.)

Tech Won’t Save Us@techwontsave.us · 6d ago

Cloud giants wield influence in so many ways that we don’t even consider — including shaping and capturing research. This week @ceciliarikap.bsky.social joins @parismarx.com to discuss how major tech companies shape society and why we need to push back. Full ep: techwontsave.us/episode/339_...

long thread on how HCI, HRI, etc. (and "AI" ofc) use ideas of "embodiment" and "embodied X" in ways that often end up constructing the very barriers they were supposedly breaking by referring to "embodiment" and "embodied X" analytically, embodiment is conceptually highly suspect

without commenting on the value or otherwise of the research in question, it seems obvious to me this is largely a mechanism for offering continuity funding for various existing parts of the UK AI research base

Kirsty Grainger @kirstygrainger.bsky.social · last wk.

Earlier this year UKRI launched a funding call to invest £40M in ONE AI lab. www.ukri.org/opportunity/... For some unknown reason they decided to fund TWO AI labs at the cost of £60M. An extra £20M. Just found. That's the equivalent of 7 more years of Jodrell Bank. www.ukri.org/news/ukri-la...

Over on linkedin, I heard from Jeanna Matthews, co-chairing an ACM taskforce on Responsible AI use (saving commentary on that framing for later…) that this decision does *not* come from ACM leadership & that community input really matters. Make your voice heard here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

Screencap of LinkedIn comment from Jeanna Matthews:

As someone who holds and has held leadership positions within ACM for many years, I would like to everyone to know that ACM Council has not even had a chance to vote on this question.  

I was deeply saddened to see this presented as "ACM Believes" this.  Many people within ACM do not agree and no one should be saying "ACM Believes" without even a Council discussion or vote.

Now is only the time for is a vigorous and open discussion about this question AND the community deserved better than a discussion that leads off in such a one-sided way. 

All the good that ACM has to offer the world comes directly from the authors and volunteers and ACM members. Those are the people who should be consulted about whether the benefits outweigh the risks before ACM believes anything.

Even if you, like me, are upset by this one-sided framing, I still ask you to leave your comments on the form in addition to sharing them here and in other forums.   A final decision has not been made and your comments  can make a real difference in the final decision.  

Please comment yourself and encourage other community members to do the same.Screencap of LinkedIn comment from Jeanna Matthews:

Thank you Emily M. Bender. I appreciate you sharing the link and encouraging people to respond. Virginia Dignum and I have been chairing a taskforce on Responsible AI use within ACM. We were as surprised by this article as anyone.  Every community member who registers their opinion on the form will contribute substantially to the outcome of this question.
Emily M. Bender@emilymbender.bsky.social · 3w ago

This is the weirdest request for input that I've seen in a while. It's almost like the ACM is sitting at the table with the "change my mind" sign. So, let's do it. Short thread with the input I gave them:

just also to say the latest ACM "request for comment" is clearly generated by an LLM "Now is the Time to Give LLMS Access to the ACM Digital Library - Why ACM Believes the benefits outweigh the risks in opening up the ACM Digital Library to large language models"

Association for Computing Machinery@acm.org · 3w ago

If you would like to share your thoughts, please use this link (buff.ly/fnANR1x). ACM leadership will take your feedback into account while we develop and implement our AI content strategy over the coming months.

responding to this request for input with a copy of Emily's thread given the way the @acm.org has been integrating GenAI slop into the digital library (AI "summaries" and "podcasts" - yuk) it seems clear to me they have trouble working from a basis of scholars' actual needs

Emily M. Bender@emilymbender.bsky.social · 3w ago

This is the weirdest request for input that I've seen in a while. It's almost like the ACM is sitting at the table with the "change my mind" sign. So, let's do it. Short thread with the input I gave them:

I was an event yesterday, about "AI" in academic life how easy the university as an institution comes to adopt AI companies' (false) narratives, imbibing notions like "agentic AI", or sentiments like "it's improving all the time" and "we'll get left behind" without any further analysis

I do strongly deprecate the disaster at Exeter Uni, and oppose its ludicrous ham-fisted cuts, but I'm afraid the furore about it is just so on the nose about Britain's class system it cannot be ignored. Oh no, not a university I think of as good and important! www.newstatesman.com/politics/edu...

How to kill a university's reputation

After Exeter’s announcement that it will cut 150 academic jobs, is there any hope for higher education?

newstatesman.com

Oh, now suddenly people notice! Absurd, pathetic. It's been going on for years. Wait until the Big Names suddenly piling in see what happens next - and where it happens. Serious failure of journalism on almost every front of the university crisis. www.theguardian.com/education/20...

Fury over Exeter University plan to scrap dozens of humanities posts

Rowan Williams and Mark Kermode join campaign against proposed cuts for arts and social sciences

theguardian.com

extremely on-brand for universities to be going steam ahead *now* on GenAI-infested edutech, just at the very moment of the shift to token-based billing because these services are financially unviable and OpenAI et al need more suckers universities are full of willing marks (aka senior management)

Daniel Bellingradt@dbellingradt.bsky.social · last mo.

“This collaboration is a result of the University of Oxford’s participation in NextGenAI, a consortium with OpenAI and 15 leading research institutions dedicated to using AI to accelerate research breakthroughs and transform education.” www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/about/media/...

there's absolutely no connection between these stories about PA(rasite) Consulting and the current UoN Future Nottingham 2 plans; the coincident mention of all items is purely happenstance and nothing should be read into this www.paconsulting.com/client-story... schoolsweek.co.uk/gagged-pa-co...

How we were stopped from revealing SEND consultants’ pay

Transparency campaigners cry foul as threat of injunction prevents public interest reporting

schoolsweek.co.uk

turns out a University Pro-Vice Chancellor in Australia has slim-to-zero basic understanding of the technologies they are simultaneously cautioning students against using, while also then using themselves to generate a supercilious essay I am absolutely shocked by this revelation

Kaia Vintr@kaiavintr.bsky.social · 2mo ago

It's not possible to do that with an LLM. Her 40,000 words is swamped by the billions of words in its training database. It may output a plausible summary of the 40,000 words, but it's still drawing from other sources.

🎉 my employer in the news 🎉 1. narrative being peddled by the university mgmt - "do nothing" vs "do our cuts" - is a false choice that rests on (ahem) "unusual" modelling reverse engineered from surplus targets 2. they need better PR people ("DISAPPOINTED!" youtu.be/y6EDlD_fWn0?...)

Hercules - DISAPPOINTED! (High Quality)

YouTube video by OddTomato

youtu.be

Channel 4 News@channel4news.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Nottingham university staff strike over plans to cut jobs and programmes www.channel4.com/news/notting...