Actual Lion

@actuallion.bsky.social

Pro-reality feminist - centre left, former remainer (I've given up on us ever going back 😞), TERF.

The SC ruling means that it is a point of law that they didn't exist before. Your presentation of the comments was staggeringly dishonest. The trans rights movement attempted to arrogate themselves rights they had not been granted in law by disseminating a false interpretation of the law.

I'm not judging Kate for selling pictures of her bum to finance her tour...I feel sad that her music isn't good enough to do that. I definitely judge the sad fucks who feel entitled to access women's bodies whenever they feel like it. They can get in the fucking bin #KateNash

Agreed. You can pick whatever "gender" you wish. It's just made up - based on regressive and outdated stereotypes. But why does changing your "gender" from man-gender to woman-gender, give you access to female only single SEX spaces. It's almost like they think sex and gender are the same thing 🙄

Vansen QoD@vansen-qod.bsky.social · last yr.

Thing is humans don't need to change sex to change gender. Trump got it riding on this hate of a particular minority, trans, because it's base was sold in this idea. Now they're getting screwed. And Republicans are pushing laws that require birth certificate for women to vote. /1

'Five judges from the UK supreme court ruled unanimously that the legal definition of a woman in the Equality Act 2010 did not include transgender women who hold gender recognition certificates (GRCs).' 💃🍸💃 www.theguardian.com/society/2025...

Gender critical campaigners win at UK supreme court over definition of woman

Judges rule that Equality Act definition excludes transgender women holding gender recognition certificates

theguardian.com