Dr. Kosmo

@aekosmo.bsky.social

Cat daddy, recovering musician, fed up with fascist fucks

Like I've been saying, they will gladly embrace the lossess of progressives Democrats, even give up the Senate, if it means holding on to power. It's right in front of you. They will gloat if El-Sayed and others lose so they can crush anyone to their left.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 5d ago

WELKER: Do democratic socialists belong in the Dem Party? JEFFRIES: What I can say is I do not support defunding the police, I do not support open borders, I do not support abolishing the Senate. We're focused on actually solving the problems hard-working American taxpayer want us to solve ...

They openly admit their election crimes & are actively doing everything they can to undermine & outright steal the Midterm Elections. Any surprise he fired the remaining members of the Election Assistance Commission? He knows if he loses he's headed for a 3rd Impeachment & an orange jumpsuit. 🤞 👍

BildBildBild

That said, let us take a moment to thank our Bluesky Trans and Furry Elders for freaking out Jack Dorsey so much he bolted and left us this nice social media playground, taking most of his crypto chuds with him. We thank you for your service.

Amidst the vomit-inducing coverage of Lindsey Graham’s funeral on MS NOW and CNN, here are two decent, compassionate human beings who won’t be mentioned, even though Graham was an acssessory to their murders.

Bild

When a profit-oriented insurance company makes treatment decisions: "I’m a physician. We had good insurance. He died anyway... Our health insurance company denied any further inpatient care... How could they go against the psychiatrist’s recommendations?" #PsychSky www.statnews.com/2026/07/20/p...

My husband’s suicide shows there’s something very wrong with the U.S. insurance industry

“My love for Randy and my professional experience were not enough to save him,” a physician writes about her husband’s suicide.

statnews.com

The Odyssey is opening so please do a wellness check on any Incels in your neighborhood. Repeat comforting words to them like, “Release the Snyder cut!” or, “It’s about ethics in gamer journalism!” or anything sexist and racist that might help them through this trauma.

Share this post with someone who has dismissed documented security concerns without engaging with the evidence. 🫣 As we continue to break down the cybersecurity realities impacting our systems, we need your help to continue to spread the word! 🫢

A substack article title graphic with a modem, USB, satellite, entitled: Are U.S. Election Systems Secure? ElectionTruthAlliance.Substack.Com Read More 1) Reach of Systems and Software Vulnerabilities

Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S) controls at least 60% of U.S. voting infrastructure across 40 states 
per their own statements. 

The Express Vote (EVS) 6.3.0.0 software certified for use in at least 9 states during the 2024 election contains undisclosed security deficiencies identified in Texas (2020-2021) that would allow USB devices with mismatched software to bypass detection 
and inject malware. 

A closely-related version, EVS 6.3.0.1, was found in 2023 to contain 430 confirmed security vulnerabilities enabling vote manipulation with sufficient knowledge and access. Given the minimal differences between versions, 
these same vulnerabilities may still exist in EVS 6.3.0.0 
but have not been disclosed or addressed publicly.
2) Election System Connectivity

Approximately 14,000 to 33,000 voting machines with cellular modems and 35 backend election systems connected to the internet have been identified in use 
across 11 states (2020). 

ES&S confirmed remote-access software on election systems in at least 300 jurisdictions in 2020, while the “Regional Results” software module in EVS 6.3.0.0, identified in Texas software (2024), transmits election data via WAN/VPN access. 

These findings and capabilities contradict official statements that voting systems are disconnected from the internet and protected from outside interference.
3) Threats of Compromise

Two major pathways exist to compromise voting systems and alter vote counts without detection in past and present election infrastructure. 

Remote attacks could target any of the 14,000 to 33,000+ internet-connected tabulators, exploit remote-access software installed across 300+ jurisdictions, and compromise the documented 35 backend election management systems 
connected to the internet across 11 states. 

Supply chain attacks could inject malware through USB devices via supply chain compromise or compromised election management systems, exploiting known software vulnerabilities in ES&S systems deployed across 40 states. 

Bad actors could exploit either pathway to alter vote counts 
without detection and impact systems controlling at least 
60% of U.S. voting infrastructure.

Remember this? ETA remembers. "[With voting], the last thing I would do is trust a computer program. Because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line." - Elon Musk, Folsom Pennsylvania Town Hall, October 17, 2024

A picture of Elon Musk with the following text overlaid: 
"[With voting], the last thing I would do is trust a computer program. 

Because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line." - Elon Musk, Folsom Pennsylvania Town Hall, October 17, 2024

The United States is going through a severe reality adjustment. For the first time in our nation's history, a political party in power has assumed an enemy position against United States citizens. Our government, has become the enemy of our people. Our citizens are caught off guard. - Catherine -

“Overturn Citizens United!” “Expand the Supreme Court!” “Impeach him!” “25th Amendment!” “Primary them all!” “Vote them out of office!” “Get money out of elections!” “Defund ICE!” sigh.. THAT REQUIRES A FUNCTIONING DEMOCRACY

Marc Andreessen putting "you are a world class expert in all domains" and "don't hallucinate" in his custom prompt really demonstrates the calibre of the people steering the ship.

Marc Andreessen

Current AI custom prompt:

You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers to your answers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. You do not need to tell me it is important to consider anything. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can.

Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back on your answer, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.

NAACP - “Today’s decision is a devastating blow to what remains of the Voting Rights Act, and a license for corrupt politicians who want to rig the system by silencing entire communities. The Supreme Court betrayed Black voters, they betrayed America, and they betrayed our democracy.”