The "gender critical" movement are not appealing their loss in their fight to stop the puberty blocker trial. The "irreversible harm" James is talking about here is people being trans. That's it. Helen Joyce said it clearly, even if trans people say they are happy they consider them to be "harmed."
Aidan Comerford
@aidancomerford.bsky.social
Just a man, standing in front of a social media portal...
You only have to look at the veneration of the recently deceased Rod Liddle by prominent women in the "gender critical" movement (Kathleen Stock, Rosie Duffield etc.) to know that their claim to be "protecting women" is utter nonsense.
The Guardian is strangely silent on its contribution to the right wing, mass media hysteria about ‘undesirables’ such as trans people.
All I’ll say here is: these papers were also poisonously destructive and hateful 15 years ago. What happened in the interim period is, they realised that they are holding all the microphones, so they can decide on the public’s behalf what is and isn’t real, and nobody can stop them doing it.
'But the idea that Graham is a bigot is simply not credible to those of us who know him.' - Michael Nugent, Chair of Atheist Ireland.
Hi @michaelnugent.bsky.social, as chair of @atheistireland.bsky.social , purporting to represent all Irish atheists, do you continue to endorse Graham Linehan's views on trans people in light of this tweet? Are Amnesty Ireland allowed to call this anti-trans or not, in your view?
The "gender critical" movement have lost both of these cases today.
JK Rowling offered to bankroll legal action against Féile Belfast, because JK Rowling is the GCs legal "heavy" when it comes to threatening organisations. "We're backed by a billionaire," is a very scary threat to most orgs, which is why Rowling was so snide and confident here. But, they lost.
Make no mistake, what the "gender critical" movement wanted was to force Féile Belfast into compliance through lawfare. That is their modus operandi when it comes to dealing with any org that shows a scintilla of support for trans people. They lost this time, and they're struggling to cope with it.
Roísin is the one helping to create a climate of fear around trans people just trying to live their lives, and her thinking around trans rights is entirely conspiratorial, when, all that is happening is that people are loudly disagreeing, and deciding they don't much want to listen to her anymore.1/
"As proceedings developed, further issues of law and associated risks became clear..." Somehow, they and their legal team were convinced they were about to lose so badly in court that they completely dropped their challenge and even gave up the right to protest Féile. 1/
Hi @michaelnugent.bsky.social, as chair of @atheistireland.bsky.social , purporting to represent all Irish atheists, do you continue to endorse Graham Linehan's views on trans people in light of this tweet? Are Amnesty Ireland allowed to call this anti-trans or not, in your view?
JK Rowling was obviously not feeling like enough of a "victim" yesterday, she found a Twitter account with 55 followers that had hoped she killed herself, quote-tweeted it in a "look at what trans activists are like," tweet, ignoring the mountains of cogent criticism of her hatred of trans people.
If you didn't know anything about this issue and read this "report" you would swear the "gender critical" movement had their event reinstated by Feile, unless you read all the way to end. Checked Robbie Meredith's Twitter following. *drumroll* Lots of GC activists there. www.bbc.com/news/article...
Féile: Women's organisation withdraw legal challenge over cancelled event
The Women’s Rights Network NI says it has reached an agreement with Féile while the festival said it as “vindication” for its position.
bbc.com
I was initially disappointed at how they had come to book the event in the first place, and was sure it would end up with years of legal wrangling (as a lot of these things do), but the people in Féile seem to know what they are at, and this is a solid and beautiful fuck off to transphobia.
John Woodcock resigned from Labour in 2018 to end an investigation against him into sexual harrassment, that involved his alleged victim resigning her job. But what do women's rights actually matter to JK Rowling when he's on her side when it comes to proscribing uppity trans people, eh? 1/
Kellie-Jay Keen is fine with prayer, as long as it's white people praying outside abortion clinics trying to intimidate women out of their choice. Pro-choice?? She believes that if you're under 16 and you're impregnated through rape your parents should get to decide if you have an abortion or not.
Interesting that Kellie believes Christians have the right to pray silently in public (as long as they're doing so to intimidate women into compliance) 😬
Hi @thetimes.com It is almost 4 years now since you pushed the story that "1000 families" were due to imminently sue the Tavistock, a UK gender clinic. If you check now, you will see that the law firm's page promoting that propaganda is now a 404 error. pogustgoodhead.com/cases/tavist... 1/
pogustgoodhead.com
Graham Linehan: I apologise. Coming soon to a screen near you.
Here's a tweet by JK Rowling from 2023 referring to her staunch ally Kellie Jay Keen as a "genius," (in a piece by Helen Joyce), and the below recent video showing Keen disrupting Muslim men praying, and proudly identifying herself as an Islamophobe while she does it.
Far-right agitator Kellie-Jay Keen deliberately disrupting two Muslim men, as they prayed in a corner of Hyde Park. When government, politicians, media and pundits stay silent about this, they’re condoning it. As this would never be allowed, had these been Jewish worshippers
This is Rowling's pinned tweet, and yet, just this week, she is funding legal cases against Féile Belfast and Amnesty International for exercising their free speech and fair opinion. She is using her massive wealth to terrorise these orgs into compilance, because she doesn't believe in free speech.
I would love to see JK Rowling take to a stand, under oath, to defend herself and her org as not anti-trans. All those tweets, from her and all the people she has endorsed over the years, just lying out there ready to go. I would pay into any crowdfunder that would guarantee that would happen.
Rowling does not "stand by every word" of her 2020 essay. For example, she cited her experience of domestic abuse as a guiding factor in her feelings about trans rights, and yet, has firmly sat on her hands when three prominent allies of her's knowingly did interviews with domestic abusers. 1/
150,000 marched yesterday in London for trans rights. Opened the Sky News app. Scrolled and scrolled. Nothing. BBC News app. Nothing. Guardian app. Nothing. This is what actual silencing looks like.
There's a long history of bigots inventing words / phrases to redefine their bigtory. Scepticism implies honest inquiry and I guarantee that the vast majority of transphobes who say "consult a biology textbook" have learned everything they know about trans people from other transphobes online. 1/
Perpetual reminder that making fun of "bad" fat people means that "good" fat people are one infraction away from you being an asshole at them about their bodies and it is completely at your whim and mercy. It's not a good look.
Not one single trans person has been involved in this 'transgender row'.
1. In an incredible new landmark review, the Health Council of the Netherlands has declared that gender-affirming care for trans youth works, reducing wait times is "morally urgent," and regret is rare. It is the latest of many Euro countries to advance care. Subscribe to support our journalism.
Landmark Official Dutch Review Recommends Trans Youth Care, Call For Expanding Treatment
The review finds that wait times must be shortened, that few people detransition, and that trans youth care has enormous benefits.
erininthemorning.com
Like clockwork, JK Rowling now offering money to help sue Féile an Phobail for cancelling a transphobic event.
Hi @michaelnugent.bsky.social, defending people like your friend Graham Linehan this week you wrote, "We should engage with the content of ideas we disagree with, not accuse the people who express them of malign motivations." How do I engage with him using "airborne AIDS"? Is this not malign? 1/