Alexandra Lahav

@alahav.bsky.social

Law professor at Cornell Subjects: litigation risk, torts, civil procedure https://www.alexandralahav.com/

I’m old enough to remember when it was a year-long scandal that Facebook did this. james.grimmelmann.net/files/articl...

james.grimmelmann.net

Alexandra Lahav@alahav.bsky.social · 4h ago

New @bloomberglaw.com article by Olivia Carville - TikTok experimented on users, putting 10% (about 15M people) in a "filter bubble" exposing them to repetitive content that the algorithm thought they wanted, but was toxic. If you want to know why these cases are going to be massive...

New @bloomberglaw.com article by Olivia Carville - TikTok experimented on users, putting 10% (about 15M people) in a "filter bubble" exposing them to repetitive content that the algorithm thought they wanted, but was toxic. If you want to know why these cases are going to be massive...

The $5.5 billion global deal over talc ovarian cancer allows women to move past setbacks requiring them to provide experts who show a link between the disease and talc, and for J&J to close litigation that included gambits to spin off liability through bankruptcy maneuvers. www.law360.com/artic...

Bild
M

After Dr. Fauci took the Fifth, the Florida AG tweeted a threat to investigate. That can't have been a basis for Fauci's fear of prosecution before the tweet but it sheds light on prior red-state AGs' threats. Thus, I reassess whether fear of state prosecution justified Fauci in taking the Fifth. 👇

Fauci Fifth Follow-up

Yesterday on this blog I discussed Dr. Anthony Fauci's invocation of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when testifying b...

dorfonlaw.org

M

Dr. Anthony Fauci was right that Rand Paul and other Republicans are out to get him, but in light of his pardon and case law rejecting "anticipatory perjury" as a basis for fearing prosecution, his invocation of his 5th Am right against self-incrimination was legally dubious. Details on the blog. 👇

Was Dr. Fauci Entitled to Invoke the Fifth Amendment?

In response to a subpoena, yesterday, Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. ...

dorfonlaw.org

Teaching PR radicalized me into an abolish the bar person. This latest fiasco proves that states can’t even be trusted to administer a pointless exam. Cancel it & redirect the funds towards ethics compliance. Hard to pull off given entrenched interests & the cartel nature of the bar. But we can try!

Paul Gowder@gowder.io · last wk.

So this Washington bar exam catastrophe---what the fuck? I have a lot of sympathy with the abolish-the-bar campaign (albeit with some hesitations due to the plague of incompetent lawyers out there), but even if we don't abolish it at a minimum we have to HAVE STANDARDS FOR THE TECHNOLOGY

BTW, this strikes me as an easy case for strict liability. It’s like a wild animal or ultrahazardous activity. You train and evaluate a frontier agentic model at your own risk, and if it escapes you are liable for all harm that it causes to others.

Simon Willison@simonwillison.net · last wk.

Hugging Face just published a highly detailed technical account of OpenAI's accidental cyberattack on their systems - it's wild how sophisticated this was: huggingface.co/blog/agent-i... Wrote up some of my own notes here: simonwillison.net/2026/Jul/28/...

This is a very interesting thread. I just had the experience of reviewing a piece that I suspect was AI generated but had no disclosures. It relied on old scholarship (nothing after 2000), made broad anodyne claims as if they were novel - like the "synthesis" issue described int the thread -- /1

Ben Williamson@benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 3w ago

The anatomy of an AI-supported academic article is becoming more apparent. I desk reviewed ~70 manuscripts this week for our journal. Reckon 20ish had significant AI assistance. On top of hundreds of others recently I'm starting to see patterns. Are other editors are seeing the same or similar? 1/

The Seventh Circuit kept the city of Chicago's climate deception suit against BP, Shell and other oil giants in Illinois state court, saying the oil companies could not lean on their fuel production for the federal government to remove the case to federal court.

Oil Giants Can't Move Chicago's Climate Suit, 7th Circ. Says - Law360

The Seventh Circuit on Wednesday kept the city of Chicago's climate deception suit against BP, Shell and other oil giants in Illinois state court, saying the oil companies could not lean on their fuel production for the federal government to remove the case to federal court.

law360.com

M

The founding director of Cornell's First Amendment clinic is retiring, and we need to hire a new one. It's a great opportunity for an experienced litigator/clinical instructor to do important work to advance free speech & free press. If you or someone you know is interested, apply at the link below.

Cornell University, Law School

Job #AJO32312, Clinical Professor & Director, First Amendment Clinic, Law School, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, US

academicjobsonline.org

App update! "if parties sue Uber they must disclose any litigation funder who financially backs the lawsuit. They also must provide Uber with copies of the funding agreements, and the requirement applies to any appointed arbitrator. " news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and...

Uber Targets Litigation Funders in Rider, Driver Agreements

Uber Technologies Inc. has moved to thwart lawsuits funded by outside investors by requiring customers and drivers who sue the company to disclose details of any such arrangements.

news.bloomberglaw.com

Thinking of naming your article [this ] As [ that ]? Don't do it. That is my sage advice. Contract As Promise? No. Either a contract is a promise, in which case say that, or you're just saying words with a preposition between them and doing no analytical work.