🔞Lucy B🔞

@alchemic-punk.bsky.social

artist, 29, she to the straights/it to the queers

If SCREEN were to pass, you'd be required to scan your face and upload an ID to access this site because it allows "harmful" material. This affects you even if you don't care about sex work or porn.

404 Media@404media.co · 4d ago

Mike Lee's SCREEN Act, which heads to Senate Commerce Committee for markup on Wednesday, would expand age verification requirements to a nearly limitless scope of websites, and is supported by the architects of Project 2025.

Republican power grabs in Kansas and Missouri are going down in flames with 18-25% of votes reported so far. Missouri's Amendment 4 aimed to make citizen-initiated constitutional amendments practically impossible. Kansas' Amendment 1 was designed to flip the state Supreme Court to ban abortion

Yeah. It's tricky, because instead of coming into your house and going through the main breaker first, it comes into your house using whatever breaker the line's connected to, usually a standard 15 Amp. And then there's the wiring itself. Did you know some US houses still have aluminum wiring?

Kereminde@kereminde.bsky.social · 3d ago

I mean, having been looking through things? I would not trust my house's power system with it, no. The microwave does not like behaving with the kitchen outlets, for instance. And an electrician costs... a lot.

Rowling signed the Harper’s Letter, which lamented, “it is now all too common to hear calls for swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought.” Are ANY of her co-signatories — some follow me — going to speak up about her crusade against trans people?

Sheryl Weikal says Prosecute ICE@leftistlawyer.com · 7d ago

Amnesty International correctly called out Rowling's transphobia. She threatened them in response. And @amnesty.org surrendered. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

yeah this problem isn't real and it would be good if wired didn't pretend it's real probably if a person can be framed for a computer crime (established) and held responsible for an accidental computer crime (established) then the relevant ambiguity is only whomst, and it's minimal (prompter)

Tim Marchman@timmarchman.bsky.social · 7d ago

If I go on a hacking spree, it’s clearly covered under a variety of civil and criminal laws. If a robot does due to the negligence and incompetence of a person or company? That’s a little more complicated (for now), @lhn.bsky.social reports: