Alvaro Oleart

@alvarooleart.bsky.social

Postdoc on PoliSci & European Studies at the ULB. Author of "Framing TTIP in the EU Public Spheres: Towards an Empowering Dissensus for EU Integration" & "Democracy Without Politics in EU Citizen Participation: From European Demoi to Decolonial Multitude".

Check out the paper that @juanroch.bsky.social and I have just published on why we should work on “Far-righting the mainstream” rather than on the “mainstreaming of the far-right”. Below is Juan's summarising thread, and the full article is available in open access: link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Juan Roch@juanroch.bsky.social · 2d ago

📢Happy to see our article “Far-righting the mainstream: endogenous drivers of reactionary shifts in western party politics” with @alvarooleart.bsky.social published in Compartive European Politics A short thread 👇 link.springer.com/article/10.1...

We identify three endogenous drivers behind the rise of the reactionary mainstream: (1) economic and geopolitical disruptions (2) the ideological reconfiguration of liberal traditions (3) new class alliances This points to alternative ways of confronting democratic regression.

We first ask a basic but often neglected question: what is the mainstream? After discussing previous literature we argue that the mainstream is a historically contingent cross-party coalition that serves to stabilise the party system and sustain hegemony at the social level.

Our main argument: research on the mainstreaming of the far right usually treats reactionary ideas as external imports adopted by mainstream parties under electoral pressure. We instead focus on the endogenous ideological and institutional dynamics of the mainstream itself.

The EU has played a key role in legitimising Israel’s aggression on Palestine in the international arena, & particularly EU Commission President von der Leyen. Check out this new open access article from a decolonial feminist perspective by @lrubiogrundell.bsky.social, @juanroch.bsky.social & I 🇵🇸 👇

Lucrecia Rubio Grundell@lrubiogrundell.bsky.social · 4mo ago

🇵🇸 🇵🇸 🇵🇸 Very happy that our article @alvarooleart.bsky.social and @juanroch.bsky.social "The Dehumanization of Palestinians by European Commission President von der Leyen: A Decolonial Feminist Analysis" is out Open Access at Middle East Critique: doi.org/10.1080/1943...

Check out our new paper in the @delibdemjournal.bsky.social l.bsky.social by @palomohernandez.bsky.social & myself! We argue that introducing technology as a ‘solution’ to ‘fix’ some of the ‘problems’ within the deliberative democracy community reinforces its depoliticisation and disintermediation 👇

Nicolás Palomo Hdez.@palomohernandez.bsky.social · 7mo ago

The paper ‘Why AI Technosolutionism Harms Democracy and Deliberation’, co-authored by @alvarooleart.bsky.social and myself, has just been published in the @delibdemjournal.bsky.social! (1/3) delibdemjournal.org/article/id/1...

Through the examples of the European Citizens' Panels and the Habermas Machine, we argue that AI technosolutionism moves the discussion away from the systemic desirability of minipublics, sidelines a mass politics conception of democracy, and leaves unquestioned the political economy of AI. (3/3)

The paper explores how the field of deliberative democracy has been particularly eager to propose deliberation as a space for a socially beneficial application of AI, sometimes falling into a technosolutionist approach aiming to integrate tech to “solve” some of the “problems” of democracy. (2/3)

Empieza a verse una consecuencia indeseada de la regulación digital europea, la política como producto tóxico. Pero no es porque la UE no haya cooperado con las Big Tech, al contrario: ha sido incapaz de imponerles obligaciones de servicio público. agendapublica.es/noticia/2031...

Sin publicidad electoral, la IA impulsa a la extrema derecha en los Países Bajos

A la carrera por el Gobierno en Países Bajos se suma el abandono de Meta y Google a la publicidad electoral. Gutiérrez-Rubí explora los dos temas.

agendapublica.es

This has taken some time, but the cover alone makes it worth the wait: 'The Promise of EU Democracy' is due to come out at OUP this spring It collects the very best on EU democracy - promises and disillusions - from the H2000 RECONNECT-project global.oup.com/academic/pro...

Book cover of 'The Promise of EU Democracy' (Oxford UP 2026), eds: Wouters, Smith, Raube and Crum

[OUT] 'Why social movements struggle to change the EU: the ‘EU mobilization package’ and the case of DiEM25', new paper by @alvarooleart.bsky.social, postdoc at SciencePo ULB (Cevipol), with Manès Weisskircher, in Comparative European Politics link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Why social movements struggle to change the EU: the ‘EU mobilization package’ and the case of DiEM25 - Comparative European Politics

Social movement scholarship has emphasized that progressive ‘Europeanization from below’ may be a breeding ground for major EU reform and democratization. Empirically, however, activists have found it difficult to make gains when targeting the EU. To understand the challenges that activists face in the context of transnational EU mobilization, our article draws from agency-oriented approaches in social movement studies to propose an ‘EU mobilization package’, comprising three recurring strategic dilemmas that activists encounter: (a) the formulation of goals that both address the transnational level and appeal to national or local constituencies, (b) the building of a transnational political organization that is both inclusive and effective, and (c) whether and how to interact with EU institutions, particularly in the context of European Parliament elections. We apply this framework to the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25), an organization founded by Yanis Varoufakis in 2016, which is a key example of social movement dissensus to EU politics. Methodologically, we rely on comprehensive interview data, the analysis of a large corpus of DiEM25 online and offline publications, and participant observation of three public events. A discussion of the group’s strategic challenges provides important general lessons for our understanding of social movement mobilization targeting EU politics as well as transnational activism.

link.springer.com

Building transnational parties seems to be a key ingredient for democratising the EU,but efforts have not succeeded so far. Looking at @diem25.bsky.social, @manesweisskircher.bsky.social & I just published this piece on why social movements struggle to change the EU link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Why social movements struggle to change the EU: the ‘EU mobilization package’ and the case of DiEM25 - Comparative European Politics

Social movement scholarship has emphasized that progressive ‘Europeanization from below’ may be a breeding ground for major EU reform and democratization. Empirically, however, activists have found it difficult to make gains when targeting the EU. To understand the challenges that activists face in the context of transnational EU mobilization, our article draws from agency-oriented approaches in social movement studies to propose an ‘EU mobilization package’, comprising three recurring strategic dilemmas that activists encounter: (a) the formulation of goals that both address the transnational level and appeal to national or local constituencies, (b) the building of a transnational political organization that is both inclusive and effective, and (c) whether and how to interact with EU institutions, particularly in the context of European Parliament elections. We apply this framework to the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25), an organization founded by Yanis Varoufakis in 2016, which is a key example of social movement dissensus to EU politics. Methodologically, we rely on comprehensive interview data, the analysis of a large corpus of DiEM25 online and offline publications, and participant observation of three public events. A discussion of the group’s strategic challenges provides important general lessons for our understanding of social movement mobilization targeting EU politics as well as transnational activism.

link.springer.com