Amy Mullins 🎙😷🎓

@amymullins.bsky.social

Radio Presenter, Uncommon Sense on 3RRRFM Melbourne • long-form interviews on history, art, politics, science + nature • Art History 🎓 at Unimelb • Versailles ⚜️, rocaille, 🇫🇷 XVIIe & XVIIIe siécles, decorative arts, architectural & garden history

🔥 Espagne : les incendies génèrent des émissions de CO2 jamais vues La combustion des forêts ces deux dernières semaines a libéré dans l’atmosphère des quantités record de gaz à effet de serre et les fumées ont dégradé la qualité de l’air

Espagne : les incendies génèrent des émissions de CO2 jamais vues

La combustion des forêts dans le pays ces deux dernières semaines a libéré dans l’atmosphère des quantités record de gaz à effet de serre et les fumées ont dégradé la qualité de l’air.

liberation.fr

If you‘re looking for show-related updates, interviews, and 🎶 playlists head over to my new Uncommon Sense Bluesky account 👇 @uncommonsenseradio.bsky.social #Melbourne

Uncommon Sense 3RRR FM@uncommonsenseradio.bsky.social · last yr.

Uncommon Sense is in its 8th year 👀, and I am just as excited and honoured to be part of the @3rrrfm.bsky.social community, as I was when I first joined as a presenter, and before that as a guest. Thanks for listening to and supporting independent community radio 🫶📻💜 www.rrr.org.au/explore/prog...

The SMH calling bullshit on the fears that changes to super will destroy the startup sector are a joke Just FIVE PERCENT of start-up seed funding came from self-managed super funds. And clearly leass than that would have come from funds with more than $3m

Bild

Hilariously, the AFR is showing just how absurd is the scare campaign against the super tax changes. They give an eg where someone's super goes from $2m to $3.18m in a year! Yep a $1.18m increase. How much extra tax? $1,528! OMG!! THAT'S OUTRAG... err... oh actually that's bugger all

Assuming it is $3.1 million, with the $80,000 pension payment it becomes $3.18 million. If your balance on June 30, 2026, is greater than $3 million (say $3.1 million) then Division 296 tax will count a balance of $3.18 million in its calculations even if your balance at the start of the year was less than $3 million (in your case $2 million)

One aspect of Division 296 tax where you have a greater than $3 million balance at the end of the year but a balance of less than $3 million at the start is that it will be calculated as if your year started with a $3 million balance.

When determining your super earnings for Division 296 tax purposes you add together your year-end balance with pension payments and then deduct your balance at the start of the year from this. That’s $3.1 million plus $80,000 less $3 million. This will give you total super earnings for Division 296 purposes of $180,000.

Despite the large increase in your fund from $2 million to $3.1 million, your Division 296 liability will be significantly less given it won’t include the increase in your total super below the $3 million threshold. The 15 per cent tax will only apply to the percentage that $180,000 represents of $3.18 million or 5.66 per cent.

While 15 per cent of $180,000 is $27,000, 5.66 per cent of this results in a Division 296 tax liability of $1528.

This assumes there is no change in the proposed tax when – and if – it finally becomes law.

Looks like Labor is about to approve the North West shelf gas expansion, which among bad news for the planet and WA energy costs is terrible for the nearby Murujuga rock art - which is so old, it has one of the first known depictions of the human face australiainstitute.org.au/post/woodsid...

The Australia Institute - We Change Minds

The Australia Institute is an independent think tank based in Canberra. We conduct high-impact research for a better Australia.

australiainstitute.org.au

This is one of the first known self-portraits during pregnancy in Western art. Elena Luksch-Makowsky’s self-portrait shows her pregnant with her first child. ❤️ Happy Mother's Day weekend to all the carers out there.

Elena Luksch-Makowsky stands in profile in a loose dress that suggests her pregnancy. She stares at the viewer (or at her reflection in a mirror?) with a defiant look, her sketchbook in her hand, but she turns her back to a large canvas that sticks out of the frame.

Listening to this excellent @3rrrfm.bsky.social interview with @euanritchie.bsky.social @yungenchee.bsky.social and @amymullins.bsky.social Did you know 96% of #Australians want better #protection of our #environment and it is the 5th most important #election issue.

Professor Euan Ritchie FAMS@euanritchie.bsky.social · last yr.

Make yourself a cuppa & grab snacks, @yungenchee.bsky.social & I spoke with @amymullins.bsky.social for over an hour today about the environment, conservation, environmental law reform & the upcoming election, on @3rrrfm.bsky.social's Uncommon Sense. Starts 29:55 www.rrr.org.au/explore/prog...

Big thanks to @3rrrfm.bsky.social, @amymullins.bsky.social & @trashcangoblin.bsky.social 🙌 Unsurprisingly, Uncommon Sense listeners are savvy!👇

Yung En Chee@yungenchee.bsky.social · last yr.

An Uncommon Sense listener texted in about @oaf.org.au's excellent #TheyVoteForYou site It's a terrific resource for examining the voting record of politicians Here're ones who've voted consistently AGAINST no new fossil fuel projects—who do you spot? #AusVotes 👉 theyvoteforyou.org.au/policies/260

Screenshot from the They Vote For You website (by OpenAustralian Foundation) showing the 69 Labor and Coalition politicians who have Voted Consistently AGAINST No New Fossil Fuels

Includes so-called pro-environment Labor MPs like Josh Burns, Josh Wilson, Sally Sitou, Alicia Payne, Kate Thwaites etc