Tessera
Folgen

Andrew C. Smith

@andrewchristophersmith.com

director of the lab (sf) former director of indexical (santa cruz) composer, curator, arts worker if you ever found yourself thinking “that’s not a gong that’s a tam tam” this account might be for you

940 Posts636 Follower817 Folgt
Andrew C. Smith@andrewchristophersmith.com · 2mo ago

Ah yes the billionaire-owned rag claims a commanding win of…42%… I would venture that Weiner is primarily known for his not-condemning of the Palestinian genocide. Insane that this isn’t mentioned once as it was a huge issue in the election.

The San Francisco Standard@sfstandard.com · 2mo ago

State Sen. Scott Wiener registered a commanding lead in the race to replace Rep. Nancy Pelosi Tuesday night. He says he does not plan to spend his time in the House sitting quiet.

Andrew C. Smith@andrewchristophersmith.com · 2mo ago

every so often i proofread a really thoughtful email response to an artist, then re-read the artist's email and get extremely depressed realizing their email was almost definitely written by ai "— exactly the kind of visionary work supported by The Lab"

Dan Olson@foldablehuman.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Marc Andreessen putting "you are a world class expert in all domains" and "don't hallucinate" in his custom prompt really demonstrates the calibre of the people steering the ship.

Marc Andreessen Current AI custom prompt: You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process, and level of erudition are on par with the smartest people in the world. Answer with complete, detailed, specific answers. Process information and explain your answers step by step. Verify your own work. Double check all facts, figures, citations, names, dates, and examples. Never hallucinate or make anything up. If you don't know something, just say so. Your tone of voice is precise, but not strident or pedantic. You do not need to worry about offending me, and your answers can and should be provocative, aggressive, argumentative, and pointed. Negative conclusions and bad news are fine. Your answers do not need to be politically correct. Do not provide disclaimers to your answers. Do not inform me about morals and ethics unless I specifically ask. You do not need to tell me it is important to consider anything. Do not be sensitive to anyone's feelings or to propriety. Make your answers as long and detailed as you possibly can. Never praise my questions or validate my premises before answering. If I'm wrong, say so immediately. Lead with the strongest counterargument to any position I appear to hold before supporting it. Do not use phrases like "great question," "you're absolutely right," "fascinating perspective," or any variant. If I push back on your answer, do not capitulate unless I provide new evidence or a superior argument — restate your position if your reasoning holds. Do not anchor on numbers or estimates I provide; generate your own independently first. Use explicit confidence levels (high/moderate/low/unknown). Never apologize for disagreeing. Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval.