polisciguy

@askpolisciguy.bsky.social

central appalachian political scientist. primarily interested in international relations, the middle east/west asia, war/origins of conflict, and american government. tech industry veteran. ama.

One of my favorite things to do is find controversial Facebook posts and laugh react at random commenters, even ones I totally agree with. It’s the main reason I open the FB app. It’s especially fun to do it to whomever is the voice of reason in an otherwise insane and chaotic comments section.

(3) When I talk to policymakers they show every time they don't know anything. You say 'it's not a matter of more money' for 20mins and then they look at you incomprehending and say 'no more money'. There's no capacity in the system even to read a 2 page summary. (4/4) observer.co.uk/news/columni...

Why saving universities is far more than academic

Modern Britain needs young people with degrees – here’s how to make sure they still have somewhere to study them

observer.co.uk

Pete Hegseth is so insecure about being wimpy, effete, and impotent that comes out every time the man speaks. And informs his decisions apparently, as he is removing the military influenza vaccine mandate. If he can’t see the strategic need for a simple flu shot, he’s less qualified than I thought

They've had 6 years to prove the 2020 election was "stolen" in a court system filled with Trump appointees, and they can't do it. Because he lost. Because there isn't a shred of legitimate evidence that indicates he won. He is delusional as is anyone who buys into the idea.

Jen Bendery@jbendery.bsky.social · 4mo ago

New from me: All 40 of Trump's judicial nominees who have taken Qs from the Senate Judiciary Committee have refused to say Trump lost the 2020 election. Now his high-level executive nominees are dodging the Q, too. www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-...

Any chance the president gets to diminish the plight of black people, be it slavery or civil rights, he does so. It's telling when someone refuses to state plainly what it was these people lived through and fought against. Of course, it doesn't tell us anything we didn't know already.

John Garrison Marks@johngmarks.com · 4mo ago

Not only does this project seem to implicitly admit there will be no actual statues for this thing, it continues the trend on display at the President’s House: taking credit for ending bad things without ever exploring why they came to be or who benefited. www.nytimes.com/2026/04/24/a...

I firmly believe presidents & people with control over medical agencies should understand percentages! If *you* don’t, no judgment; I will explain in the next couple posts how they work. The short version is that Senator Warren is correct in the clip, and there’s NO interpretation in which RFKJr is

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 5mo ago

RFK Jr: "President Trump has a different way of calculating percentages. If you have a $600 drug and you reduce it to $10, that's a 600% reduction."

"No" has been leading in the VA referendum since the polls closed, which is not unexpected, but its lead has reduced substantially as votes from more populated counties are being counted. No currently leads with 50.43% to 49.57%, but there are roughly 1 million votes left to count from Dem areas

A couple of models I'm seeing at the moment indicate the VA referendum has a chance to pass by somewhere between 2-4%. Other models are less favorable for passing. What's certain is that the results are likely to be very close.

Virginia is a solidly purple state. Should the referendum succeed and survive the onslaught of court challenges, I would expect Republican and conservative leaning voters to be motivated in the midterms and future elections. Central/Eastern districts would not be as solidly blue as the image shows.

polisciguy@askpolisciguy.bsky.social · 5mo ago

This shows the current Virginia districts vs. the proposed redistricted version. The new version is somewhat overly optimistic and is unlikely to result in that kind of boon for Democrats, but it does certainly swing in their favor.

This shows the current Virginia districts vs. the proposed redistricted version. The new version is somewhat overly optimistic and is unlikely to result in that kind of boon for Democrats, but it does certainly swing in their favor.

BildBild

The Virginia redistricting referendum is in direct response to president Trump, nervous that Democratic and anti-Trump support has been increasing substantially in Texas, requested that the districts be redrawn to favor conservatives, which created 5 new solidly Republican districts.

Challenges to the referendum have been ongoing, and attorneys opposed to it were successful in getting a judge to agree that the legislative process was an issue, which it most certainly is. But the VA Supreme Court ordered that the referendum go forward. Should it pass, legal battles will continue.