Aubrey Nagle

@aubsn.bsky.social

Journalist, Philadelphian, Sixers fan, painter, crafter.

If I had a dollar for every time someone with power in media said rebuilding trust in rural communities was a top priority and never mentioned building any trust with the many more people in urban communities who don't trust them...

David Roberts@volts.wtf · 24h ago

9 times out of 10, when you encounter "we need to rebuild trust in the media" in the wild, what the speaker means is not that news needs to be more accurate, but that it used to be left-wing and now it needs to be more right-wing.

Editors "absorbing commercial logics so reporters could experience their work as professionally guided"-- wowza, but in my experience very true! "The public deserves to know" is a thought-terminating cliche I've seen used to defend clickable, harmful beats.

jon ben-menachem@jbenmenachem.com · last mo.

"If it bleeds, it leads"—many people assume crime news is just about chasing clicks. After interviewing 58 crime journalists across 40 newsrooms, I found something more complicated. My first dissertation paper is live at @sociologicalsci.bsky.social 🧵 sociologicalscience.com/articles-v13...

Clickbait Crime News? Metrics and Professional
Authority in Local Newsrooms
Jonathan Ben-Menachem
Columbia University
Abstract: Existing research on newsroom metrics documents how journalists construct compatibility
between discordant professional and commercial evaluation frameworks. This study examines the
underexplored case where metrics validate existing practices. Drawing on interviews with 58 crime
journalists in 40 U.S. newsrooms, I find that reporters whose work consistently performed well on
audience metrics often defended professional evaluation criteria. Editors facilitated this defense

through brokerage, absorbing commercial logics so reporters could experience their work as profes-
sionally guided. Market position structured interpretive responses: reporters could avoid metrics,

override them, selectively appropriate them, or integrate them into practice. The transition from
pageview to subscription regimes reshaped whether concordance was experienced as contaminating
or legitimating. Even under concordance, journalists defended professional evaluation criteria.

It is genuinely bizarre that we’ve become acclimatized to right wingers throwing a tantrum every time a black person (particularly a black woman) is cast in something, but are also supposed to pretend that this is not racism but related to some other substantive concern.

I try not to spend a ton of time dunking on the NYT's headlines (because it could be a FT job) but COME. ON. a GRIEVING Trump? The number of horrific journalistic decisions that boil down to "we cannot assume intent or feeling of the subject", and THIS gets a mind reader pass?? WHAT ON EARTH

Bild

Today in the casual media normalization of wildly illegal & unconstitutional corruption, the complete bypassing of official channels of diplomacy, & unprecedented norm violation of having family members & cronies act in lieu of actual executive branch employees.

Judd Legum@juddlegum.bsky.social · 2w ago

News outlets that covered the US-Saudi nuclear deal without mentioning that Jared Kushner, Trump’s top foreign policy advisor, is getting paid by the Saudi government: WSJ NYT AP Reuters CNN NBC ABC CBS The Guardian Semafor Washington Post Fox News New York Post BBC Newsweek MS NOW

Probably more helpful to think of them not so much as “Canadian wildfires” but rather “climate change wildfires currently consuming Canada”

An apparent ICE-related shooting in Maine is a good time to remember to treat the agency's initial claims with skepticism rather than credulity.