pangram should not include the result text "100% of this text is AI" while elsewhere acknowledging that the tool makes errors. there's the nearby 'confidence limited', but that's inadequate to the boldness of the result headline.
Axe Ghost. On Steam!
@axeghostgame.bsky.social
Cleverly push monsters around a grid and blow them up. Demo👉 https://store.steampowered.com/app/2994110/
Training a generative model to have taste is going to run into the basic problem that generative models are, definitionally, the wrong people. I can see why this will seem frustrating and perverse, if you believe human behavior ought to be rational. But, uh.
pithy sounding but false in the relevant sense. *all* great software we use, > a certain size, needs management. torvalds has barely written kernel code in 20 years. he manages. the kernel improved. margaret hamilton was director of sftware eng for the disaster-avoiding apollo guidance code. etc
and also the internet is haunted by "hell specters" who will eat your app and its users w/o cracked LLM cybersecurity guarantees [speculative]
got nerd-sniped. on a more efficient plan boarding protocol bitbutter.github.io/boarding-sim/
once the world accommodates to llm-centric coding you can't just go back to artisanal code by personally forsaking ai because all the people/orgs/systems you need your work to smoothly interact with/be competitive with/be robust to, are themselves using llm-centric coding
[concept missing a name] is that once world accommodates to X you can't just go back to not-X by personally deleting X, as a common example you can't "just not use a dating app" as you could in 1990 because all the people you would meet, are themselves coordinating via a dating app.
[concept missing a name] is that once world accommodates to X you can't just go back to not-X by personally deleting X, as a common example you can't "just not use a dating app" as you could in 1990 because all the people you would meet, are themselves coordinating via a dating app.
Same. I didn't grow up in an abusive household or anything but the Internet was actually great and I'd be a lot dumber without it.
a thing i could have done manually, but painful enough that i wouldn't have; all translated strings in context, methods to quickly exercise those translations, repeatable test with screengrab per item per language, cropped, contact sheet overview, callout where a vision scan noticed problems
my bet: whether readers or writers, general skill at detecting ai generated prose will remain very poor. extensive experience using ai will be the factor correlated with success.
I strongly suspect this test would have significantly different results if all the readers were also writers. Wrestling with words is very different experiential training than simply trying to absorb and digest them.
"This is a demand for inherent essence that cannot come with proof. Bender’s framework implicitly requires a substantialist picture of meaning while never defending it, never specifying what this essence would be or how we’d detect it." rollofthedice2.substack.com/p/stochastic...
Stochastic Parrots Deserve Respect
Why the argument collapses under its own logic
rollofthedice2.substack.com
~everything pollutes. this is vibe-wagon hitching, not even a pretence at making an actual case.
Stop calling them "data centers." Start calling them pollution centers. 🧵👇
people have nth kid to experience what having nth kid is like, I think. parents fuck around, find out.
I’m assuming there must be some sort of upside to having kids but I have yet to discover what it is
if it's worth their time to pollute the commons it's worth your time to proverbially kill them
i think gatekeepers need to be challenged directly, lest others think their opinions matter.
ahhhh!
House House's Big Walk is equally smart as their Untitled Goose Game in the way it wields its silliness, similarly playful and exuberant, and stuffed with innumerable delightful little touches. Otherwise, it's not much like Untitled Goose Game at all. Our review: https://bit.ly/3RFnP49
Using LLMs should allow us to think bigger, harder to grasp, difficult to execute, longer to develop, ideas. That idea that’s been in you brain since forever but you hadn’t had the time because you had to retool and what not. Trust yourself. Go for that shit. Now is the fucking time.
"We're all worried," as what it means to do research (in my field, Theoretical CS) seems to be shifting, and shifting fast. What to do? Senior researchers must lead by example, knowing that not everything will pan out. What I'm suggesting below may not work everywhere, but here's my own advice: 1/
mathematics about to become (much more) synonymous with magic?
Respectfully, is that your true objection or are you a lying idiot and also a baby
asking "is that your true objection?" as kindly as i can to hoardes of illustrators claiming to be angry about copyrights and water usage
something i'm learning is that many believe that a manager isn't there to deliver software, that the engineers do it on their own and the manager is there to serve and develop the engineers and i just... you bought that?
yes. if I say 'this is my code' about AI gen stuff, that's just shorthand for 'this exists because of my decisions and i take responsibility for it' - and sensible people understand that. this ego thrashing about authorship is undignified and irrelevant. get over yourself.
Every time I see a comment like the screenshot, I feel like I know _exactly_ what kind of dev said this, and would bet money they aren't particularly loved by coworkers, bosses, or clients.
Imagining the chinese room, except at any arbitrary scale at which you zoom in, there are little guys passing each other notes in a language they don't understand. That's closer to the brain, I think the scale-invariant full-of-little-guys-ness is important
"gotta spend eternity somehow" is a keeper
if i had endless time, sure, I'd write these hundred thousand lines of Lean4 proofs by hand. It'd be great fun, spiritually enlightening, etc etc if i had endless time, heck, I'd perform the typechecking by hand too. Gotta spend eternity somehow
if i had endless time, sure, I'd write these hundred thousand lines of Lean4 proofs by hand. It'd be great fun, spiritually enlightening, etc etc if i had endless time, heck, I'd perform the typechecking by hand too. Gotta spend eternity somehow
I got into coding at age 8. Coding by hand does bring me a certain measure of joy. But there is so much to do, and there is little joy to be had in just writing the same boilerplate over and over again.