beautifulgroan

@beautifulgroan.bsky.social

Arsenal, former blogger, Dad of three, lover of dogs, politics addict and oligarch/tech bro disliker.

Not surprised about the Vini Jr news - the fact he was even talking to them after Mourinho was long known to arrive was the biggest sign they were always his priority. Good to be a viable option, even if most likely just used to get what he wanted - was always a possibility. As for Romero, hell no.

I feel like I'm on an island in my views that we're a backup option for Vinicius Junior. If we weren't, I don't think he'd be in contract talks with them anymore. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm expecting a 'signs long term extension' story to come out in the next week.

That is quite the statement from UEFA, and the appropriate response. My question would now be - what is the diluted position that UEFA will accept, because FIFA won't 100% back off and Infantino will probably have a backup (profitable) option.

Infantino is banking on the idea that at least half of the 211 nations can be bought with $20m. He's right that they can be, it's a lot of money to the lower half of nations. Which is why UEFA and others have to act. Criticism goes nowhere.

Cynical, scheming, boring and then - finally, inevitably - violent. Properly shameful operation which shouldn't be whitewashed by being called 'streetwise'.

This has been dreadful. Argentina have one aim, and it's what Paraguay did earlier in the tournament. Defend, foul, defend, foul, hope for penalties. Save us please Spain. The thought of Argentina winning on penalties is unbearable.