Bruce Calvert

@brucettcalvert.bsky.social

Interested in temperature statistics and datasets.

The Kotz et al. paper is also quite relevant as it was ranked the #2 #climate paper of 2024 (www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-the...). The Kotz et al. damage function has also been incorporated into REMIND, the world's most used process-based integrated assessment model. While the CMIP7 scenarios...

Analysis: The climate papers most featured in the media in 2024 - Carbon Brief

Thousands of peer-reviewed journal articles were published over 2024, helping shape online discourse around climate change.

carbonbrief.org

I like the new paper by @xuekeli.bsky.social and @michaelemann.bsky.social on climate change causing a reduction in temperature gradients leading to conditions more favourable to quasi-stable resonances in the Northern mid-latitudes. Although, I have some minor criticisms:

Michael E. Mann@michaelemann.bsky.social · last yr.

"Study finds planetary waves linked to wild summer weather have tripled since 1950" | Great piece by @borenbears.bsky.social for @apnews.com on our new @pnas.org article (w/ thoughtful comments from @jfrancisclimate.bsky.social): vancouver.citynews.ca/2025/06/16/s...

I like the new paper by @xuekeli.bsky.social and @michaelemann.bsky.social on climate change causing a reduction in temperature gradients leading to conditions more favourable to quasi-stable resonances in the Northern mid-latitudes. Although, I have some minor criticisms:

Michael E. Mann@michaelemann.bsky.social · last yr.

"Study finds planetary waves linked to wild summer weather have tripled since 1950" | Great piece by @borenbears.bsky.social for @apnews.com on our new @pnas.org article (w/ thoughtful comments from @jfrancisclimate.bsky.social): vancouver.citynews.ca/2025/06/16/s...

I find it astonishing that the IEA and NGFS #climate scenarios completely exclude high-end scenarios. It's one thing to exclude the much criticized SSP5, but they don't include no mitigation scenarios such as SSP3. This is completely inconsistent with the IPCC scenarios, including the upcoming ones.

I find it astonishing that the IEA and NGFS #climate scenarios completely exclude high-end scenarios. It's one thing to exclude the much criticized SSP5, but they don't include no mitigation scenarios such as SSP3. This is completely inconsistent with the IPCC scenarios, including the upcoming ones.

This article is a very good plain language explaination of the importance of sea ice when estimating the amount of #globalwarming. I am very happy to have my work highlighted. NSIDC's continuing work on improving historic sea ice reconstructions greatly benefits #science. nsidc.org/news-analyse...

The impact of sea ice on global temperature trends

A new study focuses on improving global temperature data sets in light of uneven warming across the globe. To fill gaps in historical climate records, the study relies in part on sea ice data from the...

nsidc.org

This article is a very good plain language explaination of the importance of sea ice when estimating the amount of #globalwarming. I am very happy to have my work highlighted. NSIDC's continuing work on improving historic sea ice reconstructions greatly benefits #science. nsidc.org/news-analyse...

The impact of sea ice on global temperature trends

A new study focuses on improving global temperature data sets in light of uneven warming across the globe. To fill gaps in historical climate records, the study relies in part on sea ice data from the...

nsidc.org

It’s embarrassing, but there was a bug in my code where I was not applying the Wallis et al. adjustments to those 149 stations (194 was a typo), so the estimate I provided previously is missing about 0.0007°C of #warming. I am currently rerunning the code.

All surface temperature products for 2024 are now live. All show 2024 is the warmest year (very clearly). The estimates of the change since the pre-industrial (1850-1900) are more uncertain but range from 1.46 to 1.62ºC. It is therefore *likely* this was the first year that exceeded 1.5ºC.

five time series of global mean surface temperature changes starting low and noisy in the 1850s - rising clearly since the 1960s - and showing 2024 was clearly the warmest.

My first Bluesky poll: When I produce a minor update to HadCRU_MLE in early 2025, Should I use CRUTEM5 or CRUTEM5_eba (i.e., with improved exposure bias corrections from Wallis et al. (2024))? Bluesky doesn't yet have an inbuilt poll feature, so please reply with your preference.

My first Bluesky poll: When I produce a minor update to HadCRU_MLE in early 2025, Should I use CRUTEM5 or CRUTEM5_eba (i.e., with improved exposure bias corrections from Wallis et al. (2024))? Bluesky doesn't yet have an inbuilt poll feature, so please reply with your preference.