Center for Communication & Civic Renewal

@cccr.bsky.social

CCCR is an interdisciplinary research center at UW-Madison that aims to understand public opinion & the broad political communication ecology of WI & beyond through social science methods. Engaged scholarship, rooted in democracy. https://cccr.wisc.edu

🚨New research alert! Led by @jianingli.bsky.social, we published in Communication Research “Partisanship in Context: The (A)symmetric Influence of Local Newspaper Availability and Selective Exposure on Political Misperceptions in the U.S.” 1/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00936502261463581

Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

A timely and important piece from prof @prowag.bsky.social and @cccr.bsky.social about rare bipartisan opposition to the government pressuring TV networks and universities.

Mike Wagner@prowag.bsky.social · 3mo ago

It is the last @colbertlateshow.bsky.social, airing almost a year after government pressure preceded its canceling. Turns out the overwhelming bipartisan evidence is the public really hates that. I wrote this for @donmoyn.bsky.social’s Can We Still Govern? open.substack.com/pub/donmoyni...

New research by Mike Wagner (@prowag.bsky.social) and @cccr.bsky.social shows strong public support for people obtaining abortion pills by mail. He shares those findings and CORE evidence on harms of restricting mifepristone access in @isthmusmadison.bsky.social. ⤵️ 🔍️ For background: buff.ly/vH3ZbUA

Mike Wagner@prowag.bsky.social · 2mo ago

As a major case winds its way back through the courts, we at @cccr.bsky.social are here with new data showing that the public is far more supportive of people purchasing mifepristone through the mail than it is against the idea. isthmus.com/opinion/opin...

Here's something I post from time to time. My answer to a reader who asked me: what could journalists do NOW to break with some of their more corrosive habits.

Here is a list I post from time to time. My answer to a reader who asked me: what could journalists do NOW to break with some of their more corrosive habits.

Defense of democracy seen as basic to the job.

Symmetrical accounts of asymmetrical realities seen as malpractice.

“Politics as strategic game” frame seen as low quality, downmarket, amateurish— and overmatched.

Bad actors with a history of misinforming the public seen as unsuitable sources and unwelcome guests.

Internalizing of the “liberal bias” critique seen as self-crippling, a historic mistake in need of correction.

I'm closely interviewed for this Nieman Lab report that discusses how rural areas will be affected by loss of funding for local NPR reporting. We must not underestimate the importance of equal access to information - we're about to witness a seismic ideological shift in American sense of "place."

With Cuts to Federal Funding, How Will Public Media in the U.S. Survive? - Nieman Reports

With cuts to federal funding, how will public media in the U.S. survive? Gabe Bullard writes, "The closure of the CPB will hurt NPR and PBS, but the most immediate and devastating blow will be to the ...

niemanreports.org

[deep sigh] I legitimately wonder where the senior managers pushing LLM tools get the notion that they will save time. Personal experience says it's the equivalent of double checking the work of a particularly incompetent work-study student. Such is management disconnect from the work being done.

FactPost@factpostnews.bsky.social · last yr.

Reporter: The FDA has a new AI tool that's intended to speed up drug approvals. But several FDA employees say the new AI helper is making up studies that do not exist. One FDA employee telling us, 'Anything that you don't have time to double check is unreliable. It hallucinates confidently'