Clara Bachorz

@clarabachorz.bsky.social

Energy systems modeling PhD student @ Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research | Hydrogen, e-fuels, industry

⚙️New paper out in Nature Climate Change! Coal-based steel plants operate for decades, and continued investments in new and existing capacity risk locking in emissions well into the 2060s. But we show that there is still a narrow window to act. 🔗 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Averting the steel carbon lock-in through strategic green investments - Nature Climate Change

New steel capacity expansion is critical for the feasibility of climate targets, as plants operate for decades. Researchers estimate that while existing and planned plants could commit large emissions...

nature.com

⚡ New paper in @natcomms.nature.com on decarbonizing the hard-to-electrify sectors! Which abatement option is most cost-efficient for the steel, cement, chemical, or long-distance transport sectors? In this paper, we explore the mitigation landscape of each sector. 🔗 Article: rdcu.be/ejLI0

Exploring techno-economic landscapes of abatement options for hard-to-electrify sectors

Nature Communications - Abatement options for hard-to-electrify sectors (e.g., steel, aviation) face uncertainty in future costs and feasibility. This techno-economic analysis shows that despite...

rdcu.be

A gentle reminder that if we miss the 1.5°C target (and we certainly will), the next target is 1.51°C and not 2°C. We need to keep fighting. Every tonne of CO₂ emitted makes the job of future CO₂ removal harder, and every 0.01°C of temperature increase makes the world more chaotic and dangerous.

Cover from The Economist from two years ago "Say goodbye to 1.5°C; why climate policy is off target". It has a graphic of the Earth with an apple on its head, and a arrow shot through the Earth.