Paul Whaley

@dangerwhale.bsky.social

Research methods in environmental health. Can't write. Works with words anyway. Editor-in-Chief, Evidence-Based Toxicology. Other stuff too. https://linktr.ee/paulwhaley

That's my Making Tax Digital done. It cost about 1300 quid this year to sort out, in extra accountancy fees for set-up and submission. It'll be 800 a year thereafter. I can afford this, luckily, but adding this cost to a sole trader on 50k turnover is really bad, IMO. Or doing it themselves? 🤮

I'm pleased to be on the Editorial Committee for @sci-integrity.com and I recommend you read the latest issue of REACH. Especially if, like me, you were not able to attend the 9th World Conference on Research Integrity - everything there is in here!

Science Integrity Alliance@sci-integrity.com · 3w ago

The April–June 2026 issue of REACH is now live! 🎉 🔗 www.sci-integrity.com/reach Our special coverage takes you inside the 9th World Conference on Research Integrity in Vancouver, where 700+ people from 57 countries met to confront the forces reshaping how science is done and trusted. 🧵 1/7

Recommend reading Silverchair's sober analysis of the state of peer-review in 2026. "Before accepting a crisis narrative ... the report asks for evidence. What the report finds is more complicated, and (hopefully) more useful, than a simple alarm." www.silverchair.com/news/the-num...

The Numbers Behind the Noise: What Our 2026 Peer Review Report Shows - Silverchair

The 2026 Future of Peer Review Report doesn't accept the crisis narrative at face value. Here's what the evidence actually shows.

silverchair.com

I like this take, it helps make sense of the avalanche of I'm not sure exactly what to call it that has in the last year made academic LinkedIn a haystack of bullshit and a needle of information. (Neal Stephenson in Anathem did, in fact, call it bullshit and you should all read that book.)

Marie Le Conte@youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com · 2mo ago

am currently working on a large take which is that the only type of things online are "posting" and "content", and you can only be truly good at one of them, and we recentlyish lived through a regime change from the Posting era to the Content era

Tangentially, I think this is a structural problem for researchers as well - I feel acutely disadvantaged by not having a university infrastructure around me. However, that infrastructure comes with its own demands that may not ultimately be a net benefit (so I try to fret less about that). 1/2

Hannah Fearn@hannahfearn.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I've spent the last two years fretting that my isolation as a freelance journalist have caused the rotting in my brain and my inability to think and write freely like I used to. It's reassuring that even in the busiest staff role @katharineviner.bsky.social is apparently facing the same blocks.

Just to get this on the record, the term "chinfluencers", used to describe researchers who develop high-profile social media accounts by relentlessly posting dubiously helpful science commentary, is mine. Thank you for your attention.