Daniel Wurgaft

@danielwurgaft.bsky.social

PhD @Stanford working w @noahdgoodman and research fellow @GoodfireAI Studying in-context learning and reasoning in humans and machines Prev. @UofT CS & Psych

We broke Weber's law. By manipulating the prior (ie the frequencies of small and large magnitudes), we changed how people's accuracy depended on magnitude. When large magnitudes were more frequent, subjects became more precise about them. This points to efficient coding, dynamically implemented.

Sam Gershman@gershbrain.bsky.social · 5d ago

@arthurpr4t.bsky.social has a new preprint with important results on a famous psychophysical law (Weber's law). It isn't, in fact, a law, because it can be broken. A more fundamental principle (efficient coding) shows when and why Weber's law holds true. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

📣Algorithmic Grammar of Flexible Cognition: A Walk through Latent Operations osf.io/preprints/ps... Flexible behavior moves adaptively btwn cognitive modes. But units of analysis remain representations & few operations. Proposal: formalize open-ended cognition as walk over latent operations 1/n

Bild

Deciding when to jump in and help someone—and when to hold back and let them work through it—is something humans navigate constantly. How do AI assistants handle this tradeoff? We introduce Int-Bench, a framework for evaluating interventions during problem-solving tasks.

Version 2 of Theory of Contravariance w/ @dyamins.bsky.social is out! New material on contravariance for Transformers, and the theory of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and centered kernel analysis (CKA)/Procrustes.

Aran Nayebi@anayebi.bsky.social · last mo.

1/6 Why have deep neural networks aligned so strongly with brains for the past 15 years? What explains it? @dyamins.bsky.social & I make progress on this question in our new paper👇 In a nutshell, we *prove* that for sufficiently hard tasks, the choice of alignment metric does *not* matter.

Incredibly excited about this direction: automating scientific discovery in cognitive science, with agents designing targeted experiments, collecting human data, and using the results to refine their theories. We show that this loop can lead to models that better predict human behavior!

Ben Prystawski@benpry.bsky.social · 2mo ago

New preprint! AI agents have shown impressive scientific automation capabilities. Can we apply them to psychology research, *including* human data collection? We introduce auto-psych, a framework that proposes cognitive models and uses them to design and run human experiments. 1/

Really proud to be part of this dream team! We make a strong case for end-to-end systems that can not only propose new cognitive theories but *validate* them by collecting human data! ✨ Check out project lead Ben’s thread for the highlights and a link to our preprint!

Ben Prystawski@benpry.bsky.social · 2mo ago

New preprint! AI agents have shown impressive scientific automation capabilities. Can we apply them to psychology research, *including* human data collection? We introduce auto-psych, a framework that proposes cognitive models and uses them to design and run human experiments. 1/

New preprint! AI agents have shown impressive scientific automation capabilities. Can we apply them to psychology research, *including* human data collection? We introduce auto-psych, a framework that proposes cognitive models and uses them to design and run human experiments. 1/

Bild

1st published paper alert ⚠️ in which @mcxfrank.bsky.social and I ask: How robust is the “shape bias”? a phenomenon that has been central to theories of early word learning: If a child hears a new word for an object, they often extend it to other objects with the same shape. tinyurl.com/JCL-shapebias

Examining the Robustness and Generalizability of the Shape Bias: A Meta-Analysis | Journal of Child Language | Cambridge Core

Examining the Robustness and Generalizability of the Shape Bias: A Meta-Analysis

cambridge.org

L

Join us at both conferences this summer! Our #CogSci2026 workshop features a series of invited talks on problem representations and abstractions. Our #CCN2026 community event opens a broader discussion on naturalistic problem solving: frameworks, tasks, methods, and where the field should go next.

Mark Ho@markkho.bsky.social · 2mo ago

How do human minds make sense of big, messy problems? 😵‍💫🌀 How do we distill complexity into something simple enough to solve? 🤔💡 We’ll be tackling these questions (and more!) at two workshops on task representations, abstractions, and construals #CogSci2026 #CCN2026 🧵 framing-the-problem.github.io

1/ New preprint! Reasoning models often require hundreds of task examples and thousands of rollouts to improve on a task. How can they learn more from much less? Introducing CORE: contrastive self-reflection for rapid, sample-efficient, and interpretable self-improvement 🧵

1/ New preprint with @dyamins.bsky.social + team! Ventral visual representations within areas evolve over the course of the response along the same hierarchical complexity axis that distinguishes the visual areas, potentially driven by local recurrence.

Bild
bioRxiv Neuroscience@biorxiv-neursci.bsky.social · 3mo ago

A hierarchical computational motif unifies neural dynamics across the ventral visual stream https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.18.726101v1

What is a psychological theory? Here's our take on this tricky and controversial question in this week's Experimentology chapter summary. Many things called "theories" in psychology aren't actually theories — they're frameworks. 🧵 experimentology.io

Many of us were taught experiments are for testing hypotheses. In Ch 1 of Experimentology, our free, open methods textbook, my coauthors and I argue differently: experiments are for estimating the magnitude of causal effects. This reframing has important consequences. 🧵 experimentology.io

New opinion piece on the interface between research on concepts and categories in minds vs. in neural network LMs! I take the position that there is much to be learned from this interface (e.g., learning about concepts from language alone) and outline some directions for future.

Title page of "Semantic Cognition for and from Language Models" followed by a figure showing tests that target conceptual structure and content vs. those that target function.