Mike Frank

@mcxfrank.bsky.social

Cognitive scientist at Stanford. Open science advocate. Symbolic Systems Program director. Bluegrass picker, slow runner, dad. http://langcog.stanford.edu

No 'bot' account/profile is as trustworthy as @oecs-bot.bsky.social. The Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (OECS), an update to the MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, aims to provide 'open/accessible/authoritative-scientific/broad but focused/fundamentally interdisciplinary' articles. 1/2

Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science bot@oecs-bot.bsky.social · 5d ago

Cognitive scientists prioritize how humans process and transmit information over traditional distinctions between truth and falsity. Information and Misinformation by Andrew Perfors https://doi.org/10.21428/e2759450.a2555670 #CognitiveScience

Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science: "Information and Misinformation" by Andrew Perfors. For scientists whose primary interest is in policy or sociology, there is an important distinction between information (which is true), misinformation (which is false but thought by the information pr

It's hard to believe that OECS has now published 200 articles!🎉 A huge thank you to everyone who has contributed to OECS—our authors, reviewers, readers, and fantastic section editors, and especially @mcxfrank.bsky.social frank.bsky.social and @hbaum.bsky.social Excited for the next chapter!

Philip Laughlin@philiplaughlin.bsky.social · 2w ago

Today's #OA spotlight is extra special. Just this week, @mitpress.bsky.social published the 200th article in our OPEN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Congrats to @mcxfrank.bsky.social & @asifamajid.bsky.social! We've come far since the 2023 @cogscisociety.bsky.social in Rotterdam! oecs.mit.edu

Nearly four years ago we asked ourselves, "what would it look like to have a field-leading, completely free reference work for cognitive science"? It's been so fun editing OECS with @asifamajid.bsky.social and @hbaum.bsky.social. I can't believe we have published 200 (!!) articles! oecs.mit.edu

Philip Laughlin@philiplaughlin.bsky.social · 2w ago

Today's #OA spotlight is extra special. Just this week, @mitpress.bsky.social published the 200th article in our OPEN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Congrats to @mcxfrank.bsky.social & @asifamajid.bsky.social! We've come far since the 2023 @cogscisociety.bsky.social in Rotterdam! oecs.mit.edu

Nearly four years ago we asked ourselves, "what would it look like to have a field-leading, completely free reference work for cognitive science"? It's been so fun editing OECS with @asifamajid.bsky.social and @hbaum.bsky.social. I can't believe we have published 200 (!!) articles! oecs.mit.edu

Philip Laughlin@philiplaughlin.bsky.social · 2w ago

Today's #OA spotlight is extra special. Just this week, @mitpress.bsky.social published the 200th article in our OPEN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Congrats to @mcxfrank.bsky.social & @asifamajid.bsky.social! We've come far since the 2023 @cogscisociety.bsky.social in Rotterdam! oecs.mit.edu

Today's #OA spotlight is extra special. Just this week, @mitpress.bsky.social published the 200th article in our OPEN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Congrats to @mcxfrank.bsky.social & @asifamajid.bsky.social! We've come far since the 2023 @cogscisociety.bsky.social in Rotterdam! oecs.mit.edu

Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science

The Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science is a new, multidisciplinary guide to understanding the mind: a freely-available, growing collection of peer-reviewed articles introducing key topics to a bro...

oecs.mit.edu

Philip Laughlin@philiplaughlin.bsky.social · 2w ago

The July 21 #OA spotlight comes to you live from beautiful Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where the @cogscisociety.bsky.social will be holding court for the next few days. Today's @mitpress.bsky.social publication is DEFLATING MENTAL REPRESENTATION by Frances Egan. direct.mit.edu/books/oa-mon...

100% this! I see so many between-participants studies with like N=50 when a proper power analysis would tell you you need like 500! Never between-subjects unless you have an EXTREMELY good reason. Remember, an underpowered study is often worse than no study as it can mislead!

Mike Frank@mcxfrank.bsky.social · 3w ago

Within-participants designs need 2-8x fewer participants than between-participants designs for the same level of precision. Ch 9 of Experimentology argues for making within your default. 🧵 experimentology.io