Dan Rosen

@danrosen.xyz

Scholar/researcher in digital media, STS, internet culture, and livestreaming. PhD in Cinema & Media Studies (he/him) danrosen.xyz

If we had collective reflection and mourning on covid, then it would've been more difficult for RFK to rewrite what happened publicly. But because the memory is individualized and local, RFK can easily fill the national vacuum with exonerating lies

Lockdown revisionism is wild b/c lockdown means anything from masks to stay at home orders to vaccines. It's why I don't use the term lockdown. Also any public health intervention that works even moderately will look in retrospect as an overreaction

I think this is fundamentally wrong but in an interesting way I will need to write about sometime. The key is a) consumers do not choose what is produced, or how, they choose between what is produced. This is a crucial difference

Max Dubler 🏳️‍🌈@maxdubler.com · 3d ago

I think my most genuinely unpopular take is that a widely held and genuine consumer preference for cheaper, lower-quality goods, not private equity, is driving the decline in quality of consumer goods like clothing and housewares.

this boils down to "the pandemic didn't actually happen but they still closed the applebees" which frankly i think is a trauma response by a lot of people that buy it - lot easier to be in denial that things were that bad instead of reckoning with 1.3m dead people [in this country]

Gabriel Bosslet@gbosslet.bsky.social · 3d ago

RFK Jr said these words today on national television "There were ICUs that were empty all over the country including in New York at the height (of the pandemic)" hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha You are a fucking idiot hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha <sobs silently>

I’m the first to tell you that books are tools and it’s fine to dispose of them in many cases. This isn’t retiring a damaged book. It’s pillaging of intangible cultural heritage.

Easy way for cities to increase their tax base is demand all TikTokers get filming permits the way that film shoots do. “Oh it’s just your daily blog? Send the city a check for $250 a day.”

To me, a decent film review helps you decide if you want to see a movie. A good review gives you context for the work in relation to itself, its visual language, other films etc so that you might know it better and understand the film. It helps you appreciate cinema itself from that understanding.

on the bright side, it's kind of awesome that so many people are talking about THE ODYSSEY, the translation the movie is based on, the translator's own thoughts in the LRB, and what a big, ambitious film can mean in a market oversaturated with movies about superheroes and nostalgia for old titles

Exceptional clarity from Science magazine but we need to take this one step further. Their design to break academic science is coupled with their design to re-segregate higher education and control culture, ideas, and memory. It fits with anti-DEI policies and Trump disclaimers at the Smithsonian.

The Trump administration hates academic science funding, full stop. They hate where that money goes, and they hate who it goes to. They want to keep all that money for themselves, to hand out to favored cronies who can help them get elected and to steer yet more money and more power back into their hands.

The Third Man (1949) in 35 mm at Film Forum was great. A world weary movie - tired of WW2 and the new Cold War. Such a dense movie

A still from Carol Reed’s The Third Man (1949). Harry Lyme away from the camera, runs arms outstretched through a sewer in Vienna

I think a persuasive argument could be "It is easy to share more than what we may originally intend. What data do you really want to share and is the convenience worth the trade offs of sharing it?" This is ofc, only possible with a dialogue about what tradeoffs mean, etc