David Greene

@davidgreene.bsky.social

@EFF's Senior Counsel, 1st Amdt prof @ USF, ex-SFSU. NOT any of the other David Greenes, like the ex-NPR host, the ex-UGA QB, or the 1 who directed Grease. Posts r mine only, so hands off.

In light of the revelation today of DHS’s massive operation to spy on social media critics of their policies, remember this I posted a few months ago about the tech they bought that can do just this—and how the company markets itself to do political surveillance.

Matthew Guariglia@mguariglia.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Just learning that ICE has a $4.2 million contract for social media surveillance/AI analysis with Fivecast. A few years ago I came across a brochure of theirs which used as an example for potential police customers their ability to map left-wing groups. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...

a fivecast marketing brochure which shows social media connections between left-wing groups across the United States.

I really want to see a study that looks at which young people are being forced offline, broken down by socio-economic and class factors. But that's a population that may not be readily surveyed. As I've said many times, I suspect that poor kids are the ones who will suffer most from these laws.

Ben Schwarz@benschwarz.bsky.social · 2d ago

Australia’s eSafety commissioner buried a report (released Friday afternoon) that shows the under 16 social media ban didn’t tangibly reduce teen social media use, and also resulted in parents tuning out of kids usage. We traded our privacy for no reason. theconversation.com/more-than-80...

I really want to see a study that looks at which young people are being forced offline, broken down by socio-economic and class factors. But that's a population that may not be readily surveyed. As I've said many times, I suspect that poor kids are the ones who will suffer most from these laws.

Ben Schwarz@benschwarz.bsky.social · 2d ago

Australia’s eSafety commissioner buried a report (released Friday afternoon) that shows the under 16 social media ban didn’t tangibly reduce teen social media use, and also resulted in parents tuning out of kids usage. We traded our privacy for no reason. theconversation.com/more-than-80...

Check out this clip and make sure you search the Atlas of Surveillance to see what surveillance technologies are being used in your community. www.atlasofsurveillance.org

Electronic Frontier Foundation@eff.org · 2d ago

"Flock cameras are just one part of a vast ecosystem," @lastweektonight.com's John Oliver warned his audience last night. "Check out resources like the EFF's Atlas of Surveillance, which catalogs each of the technologies used in your area." www.atlasofsurveillance.org/

"The SCREEN Act also targets VPNs .... and bill requires covered websites to verify users' ages based on their IP addresses unless the service can determine that the user is outside the United States, and specifically requires age verification on traffic coming from known VPN addresses."

The SCREEN Act Threatens Privacy Far Beyond Adult Websites

The Senate Commerce Committee is set to consider S. 737, the SCREEN Act, a sweeping age-verification bill that would require online services to verify users’ ages before they can access any sexually e...

eff.org

The new CHATBOT Act doesn’t just require parental permission for teens to use AI. It requires AI companies to build monitoring systems that store and analyze entire conversations, creating new privacy risks for entire families. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...

The CHATBOT Act Forces One Parenting Model On Every Family

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing education, and the way people search for information. Parents, teenagers, teachers, and schools are struggling with tough questions about when AI should,

eff.org

This is a wild exchange if you read Gonzales, the leading 2nd Cir. case on reporters’ privilege. The entire case is about the government trying to get the phone records of NYT journalists…the same thing the gov is trying to do now. What do you mean you didn’t know about that aspect of it 😂

Subramanian doesn't seem entirely satisfied by this response, but he has something else on his mind. He observes that the government didn't inform the Times' lawyers about the phone records subpoenas until July 17, with Sullivan's stated reason being that the government deemed disclosure appropriate after it identified "additional case law. What was the additional case law? he asks.
"It was the case law that indicates that the account holders could have standing to challenge and move to quash the subpoena with respect to their accounts," Buckley replies.
The judge is incredulous. That's the Gonzales case, right?
Were you unaware of Gonzales prior to July 17?
Buckley says the government was aware of Gonzales. But it was unaware of that aspect of Gonzales. This was an
"inadvertent error," he insists. "Nobody was looking to pull a fast one on the court."
Subramanian, still incredulous, clarifies: So prior to July 17, you personally were not aware that, in the leading case on the reporter's privilege, the court had made very clear that the privilege extended to records of this very kind in the hands of third-party providers?
Buckley replies: At that time I was not.
Anna Bower@annabower.bsky.social · last wk.

Earlier this month, a New York Times journalist was watching “The Sheep Detectives” when FBI agents showed up at his door with a subpoena. Last week, a judge had some questions. It didn’t go well for the Justice Department. My dispatch from the NYT hearing: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...

The KIDS Act is not just some benign form of digital “carding.” If passed, the bouncer at the door is an online entity capturing and storing personal data from users who simply want to access legal, First Amendment-protected content on the internet, EFF’s @irmck.bsky.social wrote for @coindesk.com.

The KIDS Act is way worse than digital carding — it is a mass surveillance system

The fact that lawmakers are even contemplating a bill that would create a surveillance and censorship regime should be a wake-up call for everyone who values privacy and free expression, argues Electr...

coindesk.com

What does a court case about drivers reporting police checks have to do with social media and freedom of speech? Potentially, a lot. A new ruling of the EU's top court risks pushing platforms to monitor what we say online. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...

New EU Court of Justice Ruling on Platform Liability Could Cause

Intermediary liability laws around the world recognize that social media platforms, search engines, and other online service providers have become an integral part of our lives: they shape how we

eff.org

Join EFF's Cooperating Attorneys List! This mailing list is where we post short case descriptions, and interested attorneys simply drop us a note to get connected with the client. Interested in joining? Send an email to info@eff.org with a subject that says: "Add Me to Cooperating Attorneys."

EFF's 35th anniversary cityscape graphic sits on a black background. Black text in a white box overlays the graphic saying: Join EFF’s Cooperating Attorneys List! 

EFF receives thousands of requests for legal assistance from internet users every year. Although we take some cases ourselves, we often have to refer cases to outside attorneys.EFF's 35th anniversary cityscape graphic sits on a black background. Black text in a white box overlays the graphic saying: That’s where the EFF Cooperating Attorneys list comes in. It’s a simple mailing list where we post short case descriptions. We protect the clients’ confidentiality, and interested attorneys simply drop us a note to get connected with the client. EFF's 35th anniversary cityscape graphic sits on a black background. Black text in a white box overlays the graphic saying: If you want to help defend digital civil liberties and want to be on the list, simply send an email to info@eff.org with a subject that says: "Add Me to Cooperating Attorneys."