Andy Craig

@andycraig.bsky.social

@theunpopulist.net Election law and policy, liberalism and democracy, and occasional pugs.

In 1940, Michael Foot co-wrote "Guilty Men," a famous broadside against Chamberlain & co. over appeasement. In 1982, when pressed by some Labour MPs angry at his support for the Falklands war, he shot back "I know a fascist when I see one."

Republicans Against Trumpism@rpsagainsttrump.bsky.social · 14h ago

Remnick: So we shouldn't send weapons to Ukraine? DSA co-chair Megan Romer: No! Remnick: So, just allow Russia to overrun Ukraine entirely? Romer: We should be sending huge teams of diplomats. We should figure out how to negotiate.w

The system barely held on Jan. 6, but it hasn’t held since. And the next time MAGA Republicans lose a national election, they’re in a much better position to successfully pull off the coup that only narrowly failed after the 2020 election. (new @ms.now column)

Opinion | Jan. 6 officially ended with this judge’s dismissal — proving the system did not hold

Anthony L. Fisher: The institutions that held the line on Jan. 6 are all now led by election-denying Trump loyalists.

ms.now

Sanders is being dishonest with this insistence the party has some power to ban super PACs from spending in Dem primaries and they're just refusing to use it. They don't! They can't stop people from buying ads. No such power exists. He's bashing them for not fulfilling a literally impossible demand.

Andrew Levesque@andrewlevesque.bsky.social · yesterday

www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-... Sen. Bernie Sanders is calling on leaders of the Democratic party to end super PAC participation in primaries, saying in a letter shared exclusively with "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" that the fundraising organizations lead to a "corrupt system."

NEW: One year in, Trump's troop deployment in D.C. is ongoing, unending, pointless — and very bad. The "America 250" flags are a particularly empty emblem on the uniforms of troops deployed on the streets of the nation's capital. Tonight, at Law Dork:

One year in, Trump's troop deployment in D.C. is ongoing, unending, pointless — and very bad

The "America 250" flags are a particularly empty emblem on the uniforms of troops deployed on the streets of the nation's capital. And for paid subscribers: Closing my tabs.

lawdork.com

Electoral Count Reform Act does address this scenario, it's one of the main things it had in mind. The short version is a court-ordered certificate of ascertainment supersedes any spurious one or refusal from the governor. The court can order somebody else to do it, too, and then that one's valid.

Adam Keiper@adamkeiper.com · yesterday

NEW: The Wisconsin governor's race may be much more important than you have in mind... www.thebulwark.com/p/what-happe...

Alex's book is great. Even if you're not especially interested in Truman or nuclear weapons, he does a magnificent job of going back to the original sources and genuinely revising the historical narrative in a way that's compelling and persuasive. It's a genuinely fun intellectual project.

Alex Wellerstein@wellerstein.bsky.social · 2d ago

Rather, I want to just focus on one thing that I expand upon at some length in my STILL PRETTY NEW book about Truman and the atomic bomb. (Which you should read, I think!) Namely, Nagasaki and Truman. alexwellerstein.com/writing/book...

There is a subtler bigotry. It's not like "Abdul El-Sayed" isn't obviously Arab/Muslim. "Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed" triggers stronger xenophobia because it suggests an unassimilated immigrant. It exoticizes him with a name an American typically wouldn't opt to go by in daily life (as he does not)

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 2d ago

RAJU: Why use El-Sayed's full name in attack ads? Are you trying to say, 'Hint hint, he's Muslim'? TIM SCOTT: Not at all RAJU: But why not just use the name he goes by? TIM SCOTT: Listen, I go by Timothy Eugene. I get called that all the time.

I have seen repeated many times, including in scholarly literature, the idea that a) the Nagasaki attack was ordered strategically because the Japanese government had not responded to Hiroshima, and b) that Truman "ordered" the dropping of a second atomic bomb. Neither of these are true.

Excluding one case of double-bunked incumbents, 159 House Dems have been through their primaries to date and 5 lost (there are 11 states still to vote). That's a renomination rate of 96.9%. The post-WWII average for House is 98.3%. This is what gets much ballyhooed as a "bloodbath" in our system.

The Democratic "establishment" is such a nebulous and disorganized thing they very often aren't even on the same page with each other. Consider how many contested primaries have senators, not just Sanders but other totally mainstream liberals, endorsing different opposing candidates.

Toby Buckle@polphilpod.bsky.social · 3d ago

we do this thing when there's an inter-party argument where the centrist side is The Democratic Party & the progressive side is some secret 3rd party that only exists in our heads

There's that re: denigration of legislation, and could also note what he's done just on SCOTUS. But more generally: we'll be living in the shadow of Trump and dealing with all the aftershocks and repairing the damage (or at least trying to) for decades to come. To claim otherwise is facially absurd.

Peter@notalawyer.bsky.social · 3d ago

also, describing a lack of legislative capacity as a point against authoritarian consolidation misses the point: the defining feature of Trump’s second term is consolidation of power in the *executive* - the lack of legislative authorization makes him more authoritarian, not less

At the moment, Trump 2.0 has no great popularity, no legislative capacity, no policy legacy that a Democratic successor can't easily roll back.

Of course it's as simple and dumb as that. But it's even dumber that the controversy is over merely *attending.* Ever since the first one in 2002, no politicians (nor clergy for that matter) speak at the WTC ceremony. They just silently sit there and watch, because it's deliberately not about them.

Anjali Dayal@anjalikdayal.bsky.social · 3d ago

the argument against Mamdani attending the 9/11 anniversary, as far as I can tell, is literally just that he’s Muslim, and reposting it is just reporting rank racism

renaissance painter: hey man i finished your commission for an icon of saint sebastian, its real fuckin sexy just like you asked catholic bishop: yes, this IS just as i asked. Gloria in Excelsis Deo

BildBildBildBild

It's not just a flippant Nazi comparison. It is substantively true that Trumpism is Schmittian to its core. Trump himself is the pure lizard-brain id version of it even if he'd never recognize the name, and outside of him, a great many of them proudly admit the inspiration.

Nicholas Grossman@nicholasgrossman.bsky.social · 3d ago

Just causally referencing Nazi theorist Carl Schmitt, as if it's unremarkable conventional wisdom, the typical basis of a political worldview. And very positive about right-wing populism. And (elsewhere, not in this column) pines for an American Orban. But, you know, not sure where he stands. 9/x

Then, finally, all of these political forces — the unpopular populists, the flailing establishment, the rising left — are displaying their vices in the shadow of the artificial intelligence revolution, which is creating new zones of power in which the friend-enemy distinction is almost impossible for me to parse.

There is genuinely nothing he could do under which they wouldn't say this. Anything short of a literal totalitarian dictatorship means it was all overblown, and if it did get there they'd make excuses for that, too. Meanwhile back in reality, we're well past Orban and easily approaching Erdogan.

Peter@notalawyer.bsky.social · 3d ago

This line from Ross Douthat’s final NYT column is something you see all the time from the soft-MAGA right. Sure, Trump’s *most* alarmist critics weren’t correct, but that’s basically true of every president. Trump’s *median* critic did in fact predict his presidency pretty accurately.

Trumpism has flailed and failed, it hasn't consolidated the kind of authoritarian power anticipated by its most alarmed opponents.

I've been radicalized on the ethics of justices as public figures: they shouldn't be. No interviews, speeches, book deals, nothing. Say what you have to say in written opinions or from the bench and then hold your peace. Otherwise you can be seen but not heard until you retire. That's the deal.

Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 3d ago

Justice Alito, in Friendly WSJ Interview Where He Says He’s in for Another Term, Comments on His Use of “Colorblind Constitution” in Allen v. Milligan Order electionlawblog.org/2026/justice...