Andy Craig

@andycraig.bsky.social

@theunpopulist.net Election law and policy, liberalism and democracy, and occasional pugs.

Good list of things to consider, adding to our ongoing debate about court reform. I'd go for most of them. I'm most skeptical on supermajority to strike down federal statutes. I'm not sure that would work as intended. (NB this is suggesting ideas other than expansion, not necessarily rejecting it.)

Ben Raderstorf@raders.bsky.social · 2d ago

*Beyond expansion & term limits. Really persuasive piece by @protectdemocracy.org's Justin Florence & Erica Newland, originally published in @theunpopulist.net www.ifyoucankeepit.org/p/the-two-br...

The NY Times piece is generally accurate (and what's described is known, if obscure) but the green highlighted part is wrong – making the situation actually worse than described. "An appointed Clerk […] exercises all of the authorities of that office until a new Clerk is elected." #HRules 1/

At left -

While the speaker does have the unilateral power to remove the
clerk, his choice for a permanent replacement would have to be
approved by a vote of House members. Mr. Morelle said that in
that case, Speaker Johnson might not be able to persuade his slim
Republican majority to replace Mr. McCumber. "You'd have a
number of members who are retiring, who I think would no longer
be beholden to Johnson or the president, who I think would take a
very, very dim view of efforts to overturn the election," Mr. Morelle
said.

At right, from the latest version of House Precedents -

6. Parliamentarian's Note: An appointed Clerk is treated the same as an elected Clerk, and exercises all of the authorities of that office until a new Clerk is elected.
Bits and Bobs@carmelseaotter.bsky.social · last wk.

'In this scenario, Speaker Johnson’s designee, at Mr. Trump’s instigation, would produce a roll of new House members that included Republicans in races that Democrats believed they had won.' www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/o...

I’m reminded of an old joke: A student is excited to finally read Shakespeare, about whom he’s heard such great things. He makes it through Hamlet, Macbeth, & Julius Caesar with increasing frustration. Finally he exclaims in disgust: “Why this is all full of clichés!”

I repeat: this IS NOT AN AGREEMENT WITH TRUMP so it doesn't even matter that it's not binding. This is the DOJ saying it's withdrawing its own order establishing the fund. But the settlement still exists, and Trump's motion on Friday makes it clear he intends to enforce it, meaning the fund remains

Adam Serwer@adamserwer.bsky.social · 2d ago

no agreement with trump is binding, it's impossible that anyone at this point fails to understand that. All that's happening here is spineless toadies folding as anticipated bsky.app/profile/matt...

Censure is an inconsequential slap on the wrist. This sort of thing would be a firing offense anywhere else, the equivalent of which would be expulsion. And even if you say it's a higher bar because he's elected and all, they could also impose hefty fines at least.

Jen Bendery@jbendery.bsky.social · 2d ago

The committee is now recommending that the House adopt its report and "with it, a censure of Representative Edwards for the conduct described therein. The Committee intends to bring a privileged resolution for consideration and vote by the full House."

In recent years we've had TV/movies covering Odyssey, Macbeth, a new Shakespeare biopic, a 14th C. Middle English poem, plus reskinned Wars of the Roses, Tokugawa shogunate, Gibbon via Asimov, and Murdoch as Lear. Meanwhile much-bemoaned reality TV is a dying genre. Pop culture isn't getting dumber!

Thank you, @donmoyn.bsky.social, for covering our new survey—part of an ongoing project that tracks populist sentiment among Americans. More below 👇

Trump's Hardcore Populist Base Has Declined By a Third, ISMA's Survey Finds

They are uneasy by his extralegal use of executive authority even as some express greater hostility toward Muslims, trans people and university/entertainment elites

theunpopulist.net

Don Moynihan@donmoyn.bsky.social · 3d ago

First, @theunpopulist.net published a poll showing that hard core Trump support has declined by about a third in the last two years. Now that Trump is governing, and governing poorly, fewer think he is on their side. (Would like to see more polling on this). www.theunpopulist.net/p/trumps-har...

data table showing declining Trump support from August 2024 to June 2026

Patty Murray and Chuck Schumer decide to strike a “bipartisan” deal with … checks notes … Susan Collins to fund the Trump regime through December which appears to not to any include any safeguards against Trump’s meddling with midterm elections.

Screenshots of posts from Burgess Everett on X:

“The Senate's CR deal is out from Sens. Collins and Murray. Funds government through Dec. 11

Bill blocks a new rule that would allow the admin to cancel grants to, for example, blue states 

Collins says the bill "prevents the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)’s proposed rule regarding federal financial assistance from taking effect"

Murray: "his bill blocks implementation of OMB’s corrupt new grants rule for the duration of the CR. The proposed rule would systematically politicize federal funding and allow Trump officials to cancel grants at any time for any reason."

“Bill also extends surface transportation programs through Dec. 11 (was set to expire Sept. 30 

Also has health care extenders 

Bottom line is this is going to kick a ton of stuff to Congress's lame duck”

“It is profitless to speculate on error.” Once again I must stress that my grandmother talked like this all the fucking time, she could have been describing a salad that wasn’t as good as she was hoping it would be

A. Is your question finished?
l. Yes.
A. I will not presume to answer the spin-off of a fallacious
initial assumption.
What was the initial assumption that was fallacious?
A.
That something -- That reservations no longer existed or
A.
something.
All right, but let's assume that I'm right.
I will not assume you're right; it's profitless to
speculate on error.

I have just been sent the transcript of a deposition my grandmother gave in 1977 while she was serving as an expert witness in a series of tribal rights cases and let me tell you, if nothing else this is proof that I come by it honest for every conceivable value of “it”