DownhillHolla
@downhillholla.bsky.social
Just a dumb lizard puppy deer! she/🦌/🦎 I post irl nudes and yiff of my fursonas! 🔞 I also post about my trans experiences! 🏳️⚧ partnered by @Aquest and @KnotsoSFW! profile pic by @dawnf1re.bsky.social
This is why it's always such a losing game to capitulate to people who demand no kink at pride. What constitutes "kink" wear to them is always changing. Saying a puppy collar is too sexually suggestive for public is within spitting distance of saying queer flags are too sexual for public.
was on a queer-heavy subreddit the other day and people were flipping out about somebody wearing a dog collar like, being sfw and fully clothed, just also probably being a bit of a puppygirl by implication
I’m sorry to put furry discourse on everyone’s timelines, but I truly believe that if they can come after consenting adults over harmless kinks that many people find “gross”, that not one of us is safe.
Child: Look, it's a red Mazda 3 like ours! But it has a roof rack. Me: That's sexual dimorphism. Child: Mom. Me: The rack is for carrying their young; I just don't remember which sex has it. Child: MOM STOP
SOME GOOD NEWS! continue to contact your reps re: KOSA and the KIDS Act, but also give yourself a pat on the back if you called! Your voice mattered!
SCREEN Act, which would have required mandatory age-verification for sites (like this) that allow "material harmful to minors" failed to pass out of committee after thousands and thousands of people called their Senators. More work ahead!
I should draw clothes more, because each time I draw clothes is an opportunity to use the uncensor frame. c:<
What kind of clothing do Pretzels wear?
read the entire thread if this passes, you will never hear from me again because: 1) I won't give face scan and ID for Bluesky 2) MY EXISTENCE IS CONSIDERED PORNOGRAPHIC I don't mean my nudes. I mean me. fully clothed. or even without pictures. my existence as a whole. is "pornographic" to them
The SCREEN Act is not just another age-verification bill — it goes much further than anything passed at the state-level or in other countries. 1. The bill doesn't just target porn sites. It goes after *any* site that allows material "harmful" to minors. You'd have to scan your face to use Google.
When my "socialist" money goes to help society, that's someone who won't be forced to steal to eat. That's a homeless person off the streets. That's an educated population, which Democracy absolutely requires. When my taxes go to subsidizing the wealthy, they take rocket rides to space for fun.
Opinion: Mamdani's idea may sound appealing, but it's NYC taxpayers who will take the hit, subsidizing discounts they may never even use.
this photo honestly kinda makes up for spending a significant chunk of this camping trip fixing my old ass car
Design comm for @spacecamper.bsky.social from a while ago ;0c Her name's Hana!!
Make sure you're not a lightweight before agreeing to exhibitionism at a party~ 🍺 🎨/📽️: @coughytoffee.bsky.social Horses belong to: @rosetintedsea.bsky.social Bottom Horse: @azzypup.bsky.social Top Horse/editing: Me SFX from: @opennsfwsp.bsky.social 🎵: Notorious by Malaa
airbnb I’m staying at unintentionally created the toughest punk album cover of 2027