Dan Libertz

@dlib24.bsky.social

Asst. Prof. of English & Assoc. Director of First-Year Writing @BaruchCollege, @CUNY | teaching, rhetoric, quant | wooder ice (lemon) | #firstgen | he/him

With generous assumptions, a new faculty line costs about $180k a year (salary, fringe, overhead). $47 million annually would pay for 250 tenure lines. According to the UMass 2025-2026 fact book, the university has about 1,100 FTE tenure-line faculty and spends about $430 million on academics.

Asheesh Kapur Siddique@asheeshks.org · 2d ago

According to a meeting I was in, UMass estimates that if the capacity of these tools were maxed out by student, faculty, staff users, the total cost to the university would be $130,000/day, or about $47 million / year.

I sincerely believe sometimes these requests are not in good faith and just try to paint skeptics as close-minded. For instance, you never hear “it would be great to add AI components when you teach source use since AI is now such a big part of search now”. No, you hear only “yay innovation!”

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · last wk.

The thing about the people who insist that AI will "revolutionise" my teaching in history classrooms if I would just be open-minded is that there is existing tech that I do already teach with. I use digital mapping tools to map the Black Death, annotation technology, 3D printing to build exhibits.

I hope researchers are focusing on this kind of thing bc I honestly don’t have a good feel for it but am definitely concerned: is anything lost when you “organize your thoughts” (definitions needed!) via AI vs conversations with people vs writing etc

Jane Rosenzweig@janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 3d ago

Interesting spread from UC Berkeley newspaper about AI use across the university. A lot about the university using AI in official comms and obituaries (!) but as writing teacher, this caught my eye. I worry about this because of course "organizing thoughts" is of course "thinking" /1

“Everyone uses it, that’s my experience,” said one campus freshman, Ben Schiro.

Still, Schiro and other students expressed discomfort with the authenticity of these public-facing messages, which AI may have played a role in the creation of.

Those students said they may use AI for editing or research or organizing thoughts, but they draw the line at generating words.

Trans people have fought and suffered and borne the brunt of the depravity of fascist excess (along with immigrants and Black people), and it looks like the most we can hope for is a decade or more fighting Democrats to restore rights we had in every state in the union as recently as 2020.

“Why doesn’t everyone love the thing that helps me do my specific job in my specific industry?” This seems to be a question that is not asked genuinely enough by some

No matter how much you throw trans people under the bus, you are still going to get attacked. All you've done is betray a vulnerable minority, anger your base, and made the issue front and center.

Alt Text:
Screenshot showing two sequential posts on X by journalist Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) discussing Texas politics:
 * Top post: Text reads, "Paxton on Talarico: 'He wants to transition your kids!'" accompanied by an embedded video frame of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaking at a podium in a dark suit and red tie.
 * Bottom post: Text reads, "Talarico says he would vote in favor of a national ban for transgender surgeries for minors," above a video thumbnail from Fox News Channel featuring a woman anchor in a red blazer, with lower-third banners reading "EXCLUSIVE," "SHIFTING THE REINS?", and "TALARICO STANCE DIFFERS FROM EARLIER COMMENTS."

Like, I'm sorry, but I simply do not believe there is a substantial number of voters in any state, including Texas, whose actual voting stance is, "I would vote for the Democrat if only they would say trans kids playing sports is unfair." Like that's their pivotal issue. I just don't buy it.

I require an AI non-use statement on certain writing assignments. If they include it, I go with/accept that (in general). Then, one way I reinforce the policy is that I end my comments on the substance of their work with, "Thanks for not using AI/LLMs/chatbots on this assignment."

it is unforgivable how Democrats are granting the right's premise about trans kids in sports even as they attempt to navigate a "moderate" position so they don't look so bad (hint: not possible) they have literally regressed! the first bathroom bans did not have this kind of bipartisan support!!!

I'm glad you mentioned Wikipedia. Very few people care to analyze what makes that site just about the only tolerable big source of info on the internet. It's mostly 2 things: a very long series of strict rules about what you're allowed to post, and an army of volunteer editors

Maybe the best example supportint the “I’m a little concerned about the stealing” position. I will never willingly hand over my scholarship to these companies (I’m not naive enough to ignore how much power these companies and publishes have here of course)

Trevor A. Branch@trevorabranch.bsky.social · 5d ago

Millennium math problem solved by OpenAI may have "regurgitated" competitors unpublished work... also they spent more than $22 million in computing power in one week to scoop them. techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/o...

In my writing course "To What Problem is AI the Solution?" I always assigned the 2023 pause letter from the Future of Life Institute, signed by most of the people building AI and the rebuttal from the authors of the Stochastic Parrots article. Students wanted to weigh in on "who was right" but /1

The Wall Street Journal@wsj.com · 4d ago

Concerns are rising inside AI labs that competition is pushing tech companies to race toward self-improving models that risk spiraling out of human control. on.wsj.com/4xlFTit

It’s 2026 and some are relying on LLMs to flirt. Two mid or late 20s guys on train were collaborating on flirting with some girl via text or DM. Many rounds of ChatGPT and “make it sound better” and “that sounds robotic.” Ugh. Just be a person! You probably have a personality! Rely on that!

We keep discussing ”strategies” for teaching in the age of AI to avoid talking about resources. It’s so boring!! The strategy is invest $ to hire people, lower class size, support research-engaged learning & stop measuring the worth of disciplines in relation to # of enrollments and majors.

Do other industry newsletters habitually berate workers in said industry as stupid, incompetent, and evil? Does "Inside Sinks" routinely call plumbers idiots? Does "The Chronicle of Auto Repair" publish 10 pieces a day blaming mechanics for America's demise? Or is it just a higher ed thing?

Inside Higher Ed @insidehighered.com · 2w ago

Small World | Did We in the Humanities Cause Our Own Demise? How much are we to blame for the lack of public trust in higher education? By Rachel Toor: https://bit.ly/4zJxZBQ #EDUSky #AcademicSky #HigherEd

Small World is typed off center in dark font on a cream background. Around the phrase, a person in a green suit tumbles through the air with their notebooks, laptop, computer mouse, and coffee. On the left, a dog jumps up for a red bone.

1. Anti-trans Democrat Seth Moulton just lost his Senate primary in a LANDSLIDE to outspoken trans ally Ed Markey. To Moulton, trans kids were a liability the Democratic Party needed to abandon. But to Massachusetts voters, the only liabilities are Democrats like him.

Anti-Trans Dem Seth Moulton Loses Senate Primary to Outspoken Trans Ally Ed Markey in a Landslide

To Seth Moulton, trans kids were a liability the Democratic Party needed to abandon. But to Massachusetts voters, the only liabilities are Democrats like him.

transiticsnews.com