Byron Wallace

@byron.bsky.social

Assoc. Prof in CS @ Northeastern, NLP/ML & health & etc. He/him.

“Dimicillin” isn’t real. We made it up. Yet many LLMs still call it an antibiotic. Across 9 models and 653 drugs, we find that drug-name affixes alone can drive pharmacological reasoning. Models often rely on morphology over facts. We trace this shortcut from behavior to mechanism. 🧵

BildBild

Surgically editing prompts to vary a factor of interest (like gender) is an intuitive way of analyzing model behavior and sensitivity. But @zihaogavinyang.bsky.social shows that we should really compare the results from such perturbations to those observed when, e.g., we simply paraphrase inputs 👇

Zihao (Gavin) Yang@zihaogavinyang.bsky.social · 3mo ago

1/ (New paper!) If swapping the gender in an input prompt makes the AI model give a different answer it means that it has to have a gender bias, right? Wrong. 🧵 on counterfactual prompting for LLM evals: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2605.01048

Our ICML 2025 workshop on Actionable Interpretability drew massive interest. But the same questions kept coming up: What does "actionable" mean? Is it achievable? How? We're ready to answer. 🧵

Bild

Can you solve this algebra puzzle? 🧩 cb=c, ac=b, ab=? A small transformer can learn to solve problems like this! And since the letters don't have inherent meaning, this lets us study how context alone imparts meaning. Here's what we found:🧵⬇️

Bild

Hello world 👋 My first paper at UT Austin! We ask: what happens when medical “evidence” fed into an LLM is wrong? Should your AI stay faithful, or should it play it safe when the evidence is harmful? We show that frontier LLMs accept counterfactual medical evidence at face value.🧵

BildBild

3/ 🏥 A separate team at Northeastern located where certain signals live inside Olmo and made targeted edits that reduced biased clinical predictions. This kind of audit is only possible because Olmo exposes all its components. → buff.ly/HkChr4Q

Bild

Our new paper asks: what is the goal of “natural language verbalization” interpretability approaches? If a verbalizer is supposed to tell us something about what’s in the target LM and NOT just what’s in the verbalizer LM, how do we actually evaluate that?

Millicent Li@millicentli.bsky.social · 11mo ago

In short: Verbalizer evals are broken! To know what info a model REMOVES from input, reconstruction is better than verbalization. And verbalization tells very little about what a model ADDS to input! w/A. Ceballos, G. Rogers, @nsaphra.bsky.social @byron.bsky.social 8/8

Wouldn’t it be great to have questions about LM internals answered in plain English? That’s the promise of verbalization interpretability. Unfortunately, our new paper shows that evaluating these methods is nuanced—and verbalizers might not tell us what we hope they do. 🧵👇1/8

Bild
D

[📄] Are LLMs mindless token-shifters, or do they build meaningful representations of language? We study how LLMs copy text in-context, and physically separate out two types of induction heads: token heads, which copy literal tokens, and concept heads, which copy word meanings.

Bild

I'm searching for some comp/ling experts to provide a precise definition of “slop” as it refers to text (see: corp.oup.com/word-of-the-...) I put together a google form that should take no longer than 10 minutes to complete: forms.gle/oWxsCScW3dJU... If you can help, I'd appreciate your input! 🙏

Oxford Word of the Year 2024 - Oxford University Press

The Oxford Word of the Year 2024 is 'brain rot'. Discover more about the winner, our shortlist, and 20 years of words that reflect the world.

corp.oup.com