Beau Baumann 🍎

@beaubaumann.bsky.social

Constitutional Law Prawf @ University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law. Formerly YLS, Cornell Law, DOJ. (Account does not represent opinions of my employer) . . . Also, vintage menswear enthusiast . . .

I really don’t think people understand that I don’t try to have a unified theory for how democracy works with apex courts for all time, for all seasons. I am operating off the simple observation that ~our~ apex court is reliably pathological in its opposition to multiracial democracy in America.

BildBildBild

And to add one more point: “Opposition to the execution can then be made to look like sympathy for a murderer.” Opposition to the execution can be used to charge people with support for a terrorist.

Sometimes people get mad at me for saying a judge did something “moronic.” And I’m just like, hey maybe hot critique of people who wield state power is not a big deal in a culture in which women in the public eye are ritualistically mocked for their appearances.

Nathan Richardson@nathanrichardson.bsky.social · 3d ago

Bad people do enough bad stuff worthy of trenchant, even pointed and rude critique that making fun of their physical appearance is not just unnecessary, classless, and pointless, but actively counterproductive. Might feel good in the moment but it undercuts the moral authority of critique.

Yeah, I didn’t want to get bogged down again in the “constitutional politics” of it all, but totally right. Spectacles like this one are a claim on the righteous use of state violence. And this one claim is implicitly anathema to well-ordered democracy.

John Carpenter’s Halloran@profhalloran.bsky.social · 3d ago

As both @kalimurray.bsky.social and @beaubaumann.bsky.social point out, the stakes of this in a pluralistic democratic society are pretty clear: state power should be exercised for the benefit of the people, who are sovereign. *Not* for the benefit of the Executive which is not a sovereign.

One thing that @beaubaumann.bsky.social addresses is the question of whether it’s any worse to do this behind closed doors. Again, a wonderful analysis of why a public execution is qualitatively different. That dovetails with my discussion of oversight from yesterday (though from a different frame)

John Carpenter’s Halloran@profhalloran.bsky.social · 3d ago

In thinking about public executions, I think we need be careful about drawing a line between public participation being necessary for accountability and thinking that public participation would horrify people enough to get them to oppose the death penalty.

You really need to buy into the SCOTUS of it all to shout out a juriscentric theory of the constitution with gusto. You aren’t gonna get a liberal alt to originalism until the contingent forces make it plausible. And I don’t think that’s the direction the wind is heading.

Bild