Adam Murray

@admagnetic77.bsky.social

All things Horror/Dystopian Fiction/Genre Cinema "A Cosmic Perspective"...

…If you grow up watching Black affairs programming in your home seeing people like James Baldwin, Angela Davis, Nikki Giovanni, Ossie Davis, Ruby Dee, etc. and hearing MLK Jr., Malcolm X, Fred Hampton, Stokely Carmichael, etc. speeches in the music you listen to? You’re better prepared for advocacy

The barriers to writing something are: you need to be literate, have something to write in. The barriers to drawing: you need a pencil or a pen, and something to sketch on. paying money to soulless corporations to have machines regurgitate bits from other people’s work is not democritization

The Observer@theobserveruk.bsky.social · 19h ago

In defence of AI slop: we should embrace open access to creativity, not condemn it Look past the Donald Trump superhero memes and the new software gives us the chance to democratise creative production. No wonder art’s cultural gatekeepers are worried ✍️ Jack Riley https://bit.ly/3SpzFQ4

Yep. The "race realist" position has been throughly refuted from many angles. Cofnas and Co. do not engage with these more recent, better informed, better evidenced positions, yet expect to be taken seriously as academics?? * same applies to right-wing critics of critical race theory et al.

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · 13h ago

how many times must academics demonstrate why Cofnas and his fellow IQ-truthers are wrong? They've been doing so for decades. At some point, you have to admit that Cofnas and his ilk (and you) are not looking for "academic debate" but to give academic credence to rank prejudice.

Sam Freedman
 @samfr.bsky.social
· 10h
Why not answer his Q? I'm also curious. How do you want us to engage academically with this claim? Or Cofnas's claim that black people hold too many positions of influence in the US?







Patrick Sturgis
 @patricksturg.bsky.social
· 7h
How about refuting them on theoretical and empirical grounds? That is kind of how science works. It doesn’t work by calling people names, refusing to engage with their claims and attempting to get them fired.

This. "How about refuting them" is not being asked in good faith. No amount of refuting would satisfy the likes of Sturgis. It's a demand for scientists to earnestly debate every crank and bigot on the planet, forever. Why in heaven's name would we want to waste our time doing that? 🙄

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · 13h ago

how many times must academics demonstrate why Cofnas and his fellow IQ-truthers are wrong? They've been doing so for decades. At some point, you have to admit that Cofnas and his ilk (and you) are not looking for "academic debate" but to give academic credence to rank prejudice.

Sam Freedman
 @samfr.bsky.social
· 10h
Why not answer his Q? I'm also curious. How do you want us to engage academically with this claim? Or Cofnas's claim that black people hold too many positions of influence in the US?







Patrick Sturgis
 @patricksturg.bsky.social
· 7h
How about refuting them on theoretical and empirical grounds? That is kind of how science works. It doesn’t work by calling people names, refusing to engage with their claims and attempting to get them fired.

You don't debate these dipshits because it just makes it seem they have a point worth debating. Treat them like flat earthers and ancient aliens and, when they shout "DEBATE ME!", you tell them to fuck the fuck off because it's not worth your time "debating" a thoroughly debunked, racist position.

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · 13h ago

how many times must academics demonstrate why Cofnas and his fellow IQ-truthers are wrong? They've been doing so for decades. At some point, you have to admit that Cofnas and his ilk (and you) are not looking for "academic debate" but to give academic credence to rank prejudice.

Sam Freedman
 @samfr.bsky.social
· 10h
Why not answer his Q? I'm also curious. How do you want us to engage academically with this claim? Or Cofnas's claim that black people hold too many positions of influence in the US?







Patrick Sturgis
 @patricksturg.bsky.social
· 7h
How about refuting them on theoretical and empirical grounds? That is kind of how science works. It doesn’t work by calling people names, refusing to engage with their claims and attempting to get them fired.

ah yes. richard hanania. *former* white supremacist. 🙄 ik i keep ranting about liberals but like, for once, can they not see that this guy is still explicitly a nazi and acknowledge that they were duped while the rest of us were rolling our eyes at his little act.

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · 15h ago

Cofnas riled up a racist mob that hounded Jason Arday even after he died by suicide but sure I guess you could say he's like Jesus Christ

Richard Hanania
@RichardHanania
·
53m
I just realized that Cofnas is a scapegoat for everyone who accepts the data on race and intelligence. 

A lot of academics are defending Cofnas' right to speak. I see almost none defending the substance of his positions on race and IQ. Many of them clearly believe he's right, but won't say it. 

I'm not going to say there's anything wrong with this. They're conceding to reality, and feel that the furthest they can go is defend speech they think is true.

But it also indicates that we'll never get past the taboo. Many have realized that the best you can do is create a few martyrs and try to protect them. 

Cofnas is dying for our sins.

'maybe you should all just refute the race scientist' im so sick and tired of ideas that roundly failed in the marketplace of ideas being endlessly debated simply bcos liberals are too afraid to tell bigots to fuck off so terrified of causing a scene and upsetting gerald at their next dinner party

Aparna Nair@disabilitystor1.bsky.social · 13h ago

how many times must academics demonstrate why Cofnas and his fellow IQ-truthers are wrong? They've been doing so for decades. At some point, you have to admit that Cofnas and his ilk (and you) are not looking for "academic debate" but to give academic credence to rank prejudice.

Sam Freedman
 @samfr.bsky.social
· 10h
Why not answer his Q? I'm also curious. How do you want us to engage academically with this claim? Or Cofnas's claim that black people hold too many positions of influence in the US?







Patrick Sturgis
 @patricksturg.bsky.social
· 7h
How about refuting them on theoretical and empirical grounds? That is kind of how science works. It doesn’t work by calling people names, refusing to engage with their claims and attempting to get them fired.

how many times must academics demonstrate why Cofnas and his fellow IQ-truthers are wrong? They've been doing so for decades. At some point, you have to admit that Cofnas and his ilk (and you) are not looking for "academic debate" but to give academic credence to rank prejudice.

Sam Freedman
 @samfr.bsky.social
· 10h
Why not answer his Q? I'm also curious. How do you want us to engage academically with this claim? Or Cofnas's claim that black people hold too many positions of influence in the US?







Patrick Sturgis
 @patricksturg.bsky.social
· 7h
How about refuting them on theoretical and empirical grounds? That is kind of how science works. It doesn’t work by calling people names, refusing to engage with their claims and attempting to get them fired.

Just a reminder that the fascist reversing the progress of the 20th century includes the eradication of the idea of childhood for everyone outside the wealth class, which is relatively new, and the reintroduction of child labor. The signs were there for a while but it’s impossible to deny it now.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 16h ago

BASH: One of the things that's happening is there's a push to start students down a trade school track as early as elementary school. Is that too early? LINDA McMAHON: I don't think so BASH: But elementary school? McMAHON: I think you can have some introduction of skilled trades in elementary

The plantation elites I interviewed for my book fantasized about taking poor kids out of elementary schools and putting them in sugarcane fields so that they would have a more stable, pliable workforce. The children of plantation elite, however, went to good schools and then university.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 16h ago

BASH: One of the things that's happening is there's a push to start students down a trade school track as early as elementary school. Is that too early? LINDA McMAHON: I don't think so BASH: But elementary school? McMAHON: I think you can have some introduction of skilled trades in elementary

This is where we are: a tech billionaire who, as an undergrad writing in the Stanford Review, "blasted a student movement to raise custodians' pay, warning it 'destroys incentive for them to improve themselves,'" is now a chief architect of a homelessness policy built around punishment and coercion.

How the Billionaire Joe Lonsdale Shaped Trump’s Homelessness Policy (Gift Article)

As Republicans have embraced tough measures to clear the streets, no group has led the way more than the Cicero Institute, founded by the venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale.

nytimes.com

I don’t mean to be rude here, but we *already* had the peer review on these racist doctrines decades ago. Hence why ‘race realism’ is a paradigmatic instance of pseudoscience: it’s been thrown in the dustbin of history long before many of us were even born. We don’t have to have this same ‘debate’

Sasha Gusev@sashagusevposts.bsky.social · yesterday

Academia is a unique space where people can pursue controversial questions wherever they lead. If the work is pseudoscience (and, in my view, Cofnas' race science clearly is), academia has effective channels for response: public criticism and peer-review.