Max Fürst

@maxfus.bsky.social

Asst. Prof. Uni Groningen 🇳🇱 Comp & Exp Biochemist, Protein Engineer, 'Would-be designer' (F. Arnold) | SynBio | HT Screens & Selections | Nucleic Acid Enzymes | Biocatalysis | Rstats & Datavis https://www.fuerstlab.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7720-9

Uh, what a spectacular opportunity there! "...applicants with a background in experimental protein biochemistry, ... structural biology, protein dynamics and IDPs, molecular recognition, enzymology, protein design, directed evolution, & synthetic biology" www.uu.se/en/about-uu/...

Assistant Professor in Biochemistry with specialisation in Experimental Protein Biochemistry (SciLifeLab Fellow) - Uppsala University

Assistant Professor in Biochemistry with specialisation in Experimental Protein Biochemistry (SciLifeLab Fellow), Department of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University

uu.se

Universities work largely because people on average, give more than they receive. They commit unpaid service to the institution, the wider communities in which they reside and the academic communities in which they work and study. Making everything transactional breaks this and society is weakened.

Once again, to bring some nuance. I review a paper right now with >10k lines of (open source) code Claude found a bug that meant a setting upon which much of their argument rested never actually triggered. I would never have been able to trace it Sorry not sorry, you constant reflexive AI bashers

Richard Sever@richardsever.bsky.social · 3w ago

So why do people accept a request to peer review a paper when they don't have time and then use AI to write the review? One might hazard a guess....

1/5 Cryo-EM gives high-resolution RNA structures, but only when high Mg²⁺ freezes out their motion. At physiological conditions, RNAs are dynamic and 3D reconstruction fails. Can we still learn their folding equilibria? New preprint: yes, straight from the raw particle images👇

„Without funding of basic research – which is the advantage of doing research in Germany – our discoveries would not have been possible”, Nobel Prize laureate 2026 Peter Hagemann points out in German news @heutejournal.bsky.social (starting at 19:00 minutes) – in German www.zdf.de/play/magazin...

heute journal vom 5. Oktober 2026

Mit den Themen: „Gewaltsamer Konflikt“ - BND-Chef warnt vor Russland; Vorgezogene Neuwahlen - Spaniens Sánchez sucht Mehrheiten; Verdrängte Geschichte - Shida Bazyar erhält Deutschen Buchpreis

zdf.de

Hot take: AI text policing is English native favoritism in disguise. Yes, AI slop is a huge problem; no, a pangram hit does not tell you whether it came from a lazy zero shot prompt, a sophisticated 200h interactive discussion session, or a 200h self written text that then was polished by ChatGPT

Harmit Singh Malik@harmitmalik.bsky.social · last mo.

Every manuscript submitted to preprint servers or for peer review should include a Pangram score to give an idea of how much of the paper's content was AI-generated. Journals need not draw a 'red line' (they should), but we should have this information before deciding whether we want to review it.

Visualising the distribution of substrings in the genomes of different organisms. Going up to depth eight by recursively splitting into quadrants, we get these fractal-like pictures.

Anthropic has used Claude to optimise structure prediction and design code to improve speed and memory efficiency. 2-3X speed improvements on AF3, 5X on OF3, 5X on BindCraft low memory modes to model large assemblies. All released as open source www.anthropic.com/research/cla...

How Claude is uplifting biomolecular modeling

Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.

anthropic.com

'Our findings illustrate a curious paradox: despite universities being key producers of evidence and seeking the use of their research to inform public policymaking, they are less adept at using evidence to inform their own decision-making.' blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...

Universities rarely use research evidence in their decision-making, so why do they expect anyone else to? - LSE Impact

Despite universities’ important role as evidence-producing organisations, they rarely draw upon research evidence for internal decision making, why?

blogs.lse.ac.uk

Honestly there probably aren't many papers anymore that at least parts of it haven't been AI written/edited and likewise editors might as well by default run manuscripts through the latest LLM as default reviewer 1

Elisa Fadda@elisafadda.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Thought: If scientific journals start requiring authors to declare the use of AI in any part of their work (as they absolutely should!), then they should also require the same declaration from *reviewers* 🧵1/3