Pablo Martínez-López

@martinezlopezp.bsky.social

PhD student in Experimental Psychology at @univmalaga.bsky.social https://martinez-lopezpablo.github.io

We make flexible choices in new situations by knitting together information from separate relevant memories. But what governs which memories are retrieved and when? In a new preprint, we captured how people build decision variables from different memories by tracking their gaze on a blank screen.

Flexible decisions arise from resource-rational memory sampling

Flexible decision making depends on retrieving and recombining memories. Yet because this process unfolds covertly, its governing principles remain unknown. Here we use gaze reinstatement to uncover t...

biorxiv.org

Habit research has accumulated many tasks that supposedly tap into the same construct, yet their psychometric properties are rarely examined. Here, we assess their construct validity evidence and analyze their reliability to facilitate interpretation of previous studies and guide novel research ⬇️📝

PsyArXivBot@psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 2mo ago

The Experimental Study of Habitual Behavior in Humans: A Review of the Validity of Current Protocols: https://osf.io/r62pa

Recent preprint with Oriel FeldmanHall and Matt Nassar, showing clear neural evidence that adolescent (13-15 yrs) social media and smartphones use are associated with blunted reward signaling in the ventral striatum, the brain's reward processing hub, and worse mental health. osf.io/preprints/ps...

Bild

Theorizing After the Results are Known "TARKing: a practice whereby researchers alter, exchange, add, or remove theoretical frameworks post hoc not only to achieve greater consistency with their findings but, more importantly, to conform to reviewer suggestions." doi.org/10.1017/iop....

Where is my theoretical framework? When developmental reviewing turns into theorizing after results are known (TARKing)

We're hiring! Looking for a postdoc to work at UNSW Sydney, studying impacts of reward and information on attention, using eye-tracking, EEG, and modelling - with Kelly Garner, Daniel Pearson and me. Application link below, please spread the word! external-careers.jobs.unsw.edu.au/cw/en/job/53...

Research Associate - Psychology

The Research Associate (Level A) is expected to contribute towards the research effort of UNSW and to develop their research expertise through the pursuit of defined projects relevant to their particu...

external-careers.jobs.unsw.edu.au

🚨🚨 We are hiring a Postdoc at CIMCYC – University of Granada (Spain) 🚨🚨 2 year position in Neuroscience of Human Experience Building new ways to study lived experience as it unfolds in time and maps onto brain, body and behavior Please share‼️

I'm so excited to share our new paper! 🎉 After ten years in the making, it's finally out in Journal of Memory and Language! We present preliminary evidence that perturbing motor activity shapes how people conceptualize the meaning of action sentences. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... 1/7

Action and abstraction: Motor interference changes meaning in language understanding

Can the body shape meaning? Eight experiments (four preregistered) tested whether interfering with the motor system changes how people interpret langu…

sciencedirect.com

The Iowa Gambling Task is an extreme example of Jingle Fallacy and schmeasurement. In 100 articles we found 244 different ways of scoring it, 177 were never reused. Correlations between them range -.99 to .99. At the same time, we show meta-analyses combine these results as if they’re equivalent.

Annika Külpmann@anniria.bsky.social · 6mo ago

How many versions of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) exist? And how much does this affect research using the IGT? More than you might think. 🧵